ArticleJournal of vision2017
Linking crowding, visual span, and reading.
Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Visual Crowding on Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- The impact of amblyopia, reduced viewing conditions and binocular vision on reading ability: a narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Parkinson's disease and reading performance.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Age-Related Changes in Mesopic Reading Vision Across Adulthood.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Investigating the crowding effect on letters and symbols in deaf adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Customizing spatial remapping of letters to aid reading in the presence of a simulated central field loss.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Enhancing the Functional Performance of Patients with Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration Implanted with a Miniature Telescope using Rehabilitation Training.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Abnormal basic visual processing functions in binocular fusion disorders.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Consistency of preferred retinal locus across tasks and participants trained with a simulated scotoma.Vision research · 2023Article
- Training to improve temporal processing of letters benefits reading speed for people with central vision loss.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Aging and Pattern Complexity Effects on the Visual Span: Evidence from Chinese Character Recognition.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Korean reading speed: Effects of print size and retinal eccentricity.Vision research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual span is hypothesized to be a sensory bottleneck on reading speed with crowding thought to be the major sensory factor limiting the size of the visual span. This proposed linkage between crowding, visual span, and reading speed is challenged by the finding that training to read crowded letters reduced crowding but did not improve reading speed (Chung, 2007). Here, we examined two properties of letter-recognition training that may influence the transfer to improved reading: the spatial arrangement of training stimuli and the presence of flankers. Three groups of nine young adults were trained with different configurations of letter stimuli at 10° in the lower visual field: a flanked-local group (flanked letters localized at one position), a flanked-distributed group (flanked letters distributed across different horizontal locations), and an isolated-distributed group (isolated and distributed letters). We found that distributed training, but not the presence of flankers, appears to be necessary for the training benefit to transfer to increased reading speed. Localized training may have biased attention to one specific, small area in the visual field, thereby failing to improve reading. We conclude that the visual span represents a sensory bottleneck on reading, but there may also be an attentional bottleneck. Reducing the impact of crowding can enlarge the visual span and can potentially facilitate reading, but not when adverse attentional bias is present. Our results clarify the association between crowding, visual span, and reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.