ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017
Imaging Lenticular Autofluorescence in Older Subjects.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of lens opacities and cataract severity on quantitative fundus autofluorescence as a secondary outcome of a randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Measuring Rod- and Cone-Photoreceptor-Specific Vision in Inherited Retinal Diseases Using a Commercial Perimeter.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Quantitative and Rapid In Vivo Imaging of Human Lenticular Fluorescence.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Retinal Structure and Visual Function in Blue Cone Monochromacy to Develop Clinical Endpoints for L-opsin Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Impact of lens autofluorescence and opacification on retinal imaging.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Personalized Lens Correction Improves Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence Analysis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Retest variability and patient reliability indices of quantitative fundus autofluorescence in age-related macular degeneration: a MACUSTAR study report.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Impact of the Aging Lens and Posterior Capsular Opacification on Quantitative Autofluorescence Imaging in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Long-term development of lens fluorescence in a twin cohort: Heritability and effects of age and lifestyle.PloS one · 2022Article
- Lens fluorescence and skin fluorescence in the Copenhagen Twin Cohort Eye Study: Covariates and heritability.PloS one · 2021Article
- Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence in Rhesus Macaques in Aging and Age-Related Drusen.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Mesopic and dark-adapted two-color fundus-controlled perimetry in patients with cuticular, reticular, and soft drusen.Eye (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether a practical method of imaging lenticular autofluorescence (AF) can provide an individualized measure correlated with age-related lens yellowing in older subjects undergoing tests involving shorter wavelength lights. Methods: Lenticular AF was imaged with 488-nm excitation using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) routinely used for retinal AF imaging. There were 75 older subjects (ages 47-87) at two sites; a small cohort of younger subjects served as controls. At one site, the cSLO was equipped with an internal reference to allow quantitative AF measurements; at the other site, reduced-illuminance AF imaging (RAFI) was used. In a subset of subjects, lens density index was independently estimated from dark-adapted spectral sensitivities performed psychophysically. Results: Lenticular AF intensity was significantly higher in the older eyes than the younger cohort when measured with the internal reference (59.2 ± 15.4 vs. 134.4 ± 31.7 gray levels; P < 0.05) as well as when recorded with RAFI without the internal reference (10.9 ± 1.5 vs. 26.1 ± 5.7 gray levels; P < 0.05). Lenticular AF was positively correlated with age; however, there could also be large differences between individuals of similar age. Lenticular AF intensity correlated well with lens density indices estimated from psychophysical measures. Conclusions: Lenticular AF measured with a retinal cSLO can provide a practical and individualized measure of lens yellowing, and may be a good candidate to distinguish between preretinal and retinal deficits involving short-wavelength lights in older eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.