Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973329›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

The Ability of Nitric Oxide to Lower Intraocular Pressure Is Dependent on Guanylyl Cyclase.

Stefan Muenster, Wolfgang S Lieb, Gregor Fabry, Kaitlin N Allen, Shivani S Kamat, Ann H Guy, Ana C Dordea, Leandro Teixeira, Robert E Tainsh, Binglan Yu and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gasotransmitters in Glaucoma: A New Paradigm.Bulletin of pharmaceutical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nitric Oxide Interaction with the Eye.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Identification of Candidate miRNA Biomarkers for Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The nitric oxide-guanylate cyclase pathway and glaucoma.Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan MuensterAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Wolfgang S LiebAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Gregor FabryAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Kaitlin N AllenAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Shivani S KamatMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Ann H GuyMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Ana C DordeaAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Leandro TeixeiraDepartment of Pathological Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, United States.
Robert E TainshAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Binglan YuAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Wei ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Nicole E AshpoleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Rajeev MalhotraCardiovascular Research Center and Cardiology Division of the Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Peter BrouckaertDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Department of Molecular Biomedical Research, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.
Donald B BlochAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Marielle Scherrer-CrosbieAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
W Daniel StamerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Markus H KuehnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Louis R PasqualeMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Emmanuel S BuysAnesthesia Center for Critical Care Research, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USDuke University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USUniversity of Iowa · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGhent University · BEUniversity of Stuttgart · DEUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Goldis Malek · 1985 to 2026
$19.3M
eNOS-Dependent Mechanoregulation of Intraocular PressureR01EY022359 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STAMER, W DANIEL · 2012 to 2025
$5.6M
Modulation of Hepcidin-Ferroportin Signaling using Small MoleculesR01DK082971 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BLOCH, DONALD B, PETERSON, RANDALL T · 2009 to 2018
$4.5M
Role of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Alpha 1 in Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY022746 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BUYS, EMMANUEL S · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Stem Cell Therapy for GlaucomaI01RX001163 · VA · IOWA CITY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KUEHN, MARKUS H. · 2015 to 2017
–
Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual LossI50RX003002 · VA · IOWA CITY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RANDY H. KARDON, MARKUS H. KUEHN · 2019 to 2026
–
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022359NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022746NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082971RRD VA I01 RX001163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: While nitric oxide (NO) donors are emerging as treatments for glaucoma, the mechanism by which NO lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) is unclear. NO activates the enzyme guanylyl cyclase (GC) to produce cyclic guanosine monophosphate. We studied the ocular effects of inhaled and topically applied NO gas in mice and lambs, respectively. Methods: IOP and aqueous humor (AqH) outflow were measured in WT and GC-1α subunit null (GC-1-/-) mice. Mice breathed 40 parts per million (ppm) NO in O2 or control gas (N2/O2). We also studied the effect of ocular NO gas exposure (80, 250, 500, and 1000 ppm) on IOP in anesthetized lambs. NO metabolites were measured in AqH and plasma. Results: In awake WT mice, breathing NO for 40 minutes lowered IOP from 14.4 ± 1.9 mm Hg to 10.9 ± 1.0 mm Hg (n = 11, P < 0.001). Comparable results were obtained in anesthetized WT mice (n = 10, P < 0.001). In awake or anesthetized GC-1-/- mice, IOP did not change under similar experimental conditions (P ≥ 0.08, n = 20). Breathing NO increased in vivo outflow facility in WT but not GC-1-/- mice (+13.7 ± 14.6% vs. -12.1 ± 9.4%, n = 4 each, P < 0.05). In lambs, ocular exposure to NO lowered IOP in a dose-dependent manner (-0.43 mm Hg/ppm NO; n = 5 with 40 total measurements; P = 0.04) without producing corneal pathology or altering pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics. After ocular NO exposure, NO metabolites were increased in AqH (n = 8, P < 0.001) but not in plasma. Conclusions: Breathing NO reduced IOP and increased outflow facility in a GC-dependent manner in mice. Exposure of ovine eyes to NO lowers IOP.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, TopicalAnimalsAqueous HumorDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGuanylate CyclaseIntraocular PressureMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNitric OxideSheepGuanylate CyclaseNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID28973329
PMCPMC5624778
OpenAlexW2740776990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.