Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973254›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2018

Propranolol for Off-label Treatment of Patients With Melanoma: Results From a Cohort Study.

Vincenzo De Giorgi, Marta Grazzini, Silvia Benemei, Niccolò Marchionni, Edoardo Botteri, Elisabetta Pennacchioli, Pierangelo Geppetti, Sara Gandini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. AI in drug repurposing for cancer therapies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincenzo De GiorgiDepartment of Dermatology, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marta GrazziniDepartment of Dermatology, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Silvia BenemeiDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Niccolò MarchionniCardiothoracovascular Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Edoardo BotteriCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabetta PennacchioliSurgical Department Melanoma, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Pierangelo GeppettiDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sara GandiniDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Azienda Usl Toscana Centro · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCancer Registry of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePreclinical and retrospective studies showed that β-blockers inhibit angiogenesis and disrupt migration of melanoma cells via inhibition of noradrenaline-dependent responses.

objectiveTo study the clinical effectiveness of β-blocker therapy in patients with melanoma and to determine whether propranolol improves progression-free survival in patients with melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe conducted a prospective study in patients treated for melanoma in our center with propranolol for off-label use. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IB to IIIA cutaneous melanoma and no evidence of metastasis were eligible for the study. At the time of diagnosis, they were asked to take propranolol (80 mg daily) as an off-label adjuvant treatment. If they accepted the treatment, they were considered part of the propranolol cohort (PROP). If they refused treatment but agreed to participate in the study control group, they were considered part of the nonpropranolol cohort (No-PROP). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Disease progression was assessed by evaluating the presence of lymphatic, in-transit, or visceral metastases, and the cause of death was recorded.

resultsAmong the 53 patients (median [interquartile range] age 63 [48-75] years; 33 men) included in the study, 19 were eligible for the PROP cohort. Thirty-four patients otherwise eligible but unwilling to take propranolol were enrolled in the No-PROP cohort. The 2 cohorts were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and primary prognostic factors at baseline. After adjusting for known prognostic factors, Cox models confirmed that use of propranolol at the time of diagnosis was significantly inversely associated with recurrence of melanoma with approximately an 80% risk reduction for propranolol users (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.89; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the absence of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, this study is the first off-label study of which we are aware of propranolol for melanoma treatment. These results confirm recent observation that β-blockers protect patients with thick cutaneous melanoma from disease recurrence. This study is in accordance with the present policy of "drug repurposing" in oncology. Repurposing the vast arsenal of approved drugs with a nononcology primary purpose may prove an attractive and inexpensive strategy for offering more effective treatment options to patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Off-Label UseAgedCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPropranololRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomePropranolol

Identifiers

PMID28973254
PMCPMC5838568
OpenAlexW2760246662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.