Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-The First Test for Evaluating Patients With Chest Pain?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluation of the Appropriate Use of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
   Article
2. Noninvasive Testing for Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in the Elderly.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
   Review
3. Omitted Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest.JAMA internal medicine · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Disagreement With the NICE Decision.2018
• Comment on
  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.2017
• Erratum issued
  Omitted Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as