Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973115›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017

Effect of a Game-Based Intervention Designed to Enhance Social Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Families: The BE FIT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mitesh S Patel, Emelia J Benjamin, Kevin G Volpp, Caroline S Fox, Dylan S Small, Joseph M Massaro, Jane J Lee, Victoria Hilbert, Maureen Valentino, Devon H Taylor and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02531763 (Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02531763 nacompletednot on this map

Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Ran2015 to 2016Enrolled206ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsSocial incentive intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A randomized trial of behavioral interventions yielding sustained reductions in distracted driving.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mitesh S PatelDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Emelia J BenjaminFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Kevin G VolppDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Caroline S FoxNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Intramural Program, Bethesda, Maryland.
Dylan S SmallLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Joseph M MassaroDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jane J LeeFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Victoria HilbertLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Maureen ValentinoFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Devon H TaylorLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Emily S MandersFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Karen MutalikFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Jingsan ZhuLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Wenli WangLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Joanne M MurabitoFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts.

Funding

The Penn Roybal Center on Behavioral Economics and Health: Solving for Scale and Impact with Design Thinking, Digital Platforms, and Dynamic AdaptationP30AG034546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Alison Meredith Buttenheim, KEVIN G VOLPP · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gamification, the application of game design elements such as points and levels in nongame contexts, is often used in digital health interventions, but evidence on its effectiveness is limited. Objective: To test the effectiveness of a gamification intervention designed using insights from behavioral economics to enhance social incentives within families to increase physical activity. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial (BE FIT) was a randomized clinical trial with a 12-week intervention period and a 12-week follow-up period. The investigation was a community-based study between December 7, 2015, and August 14, 2016. Participants in the modified intent-to-treat analysis were adults enrolled in the Framingham Heart Study, a long-standing cohort of families. Interventions: All participants tracked daily step counts using a wearable device or a smartphone, established a baseline, selected a step goal increase, and received daily individual feedback on goal performance by text message or email for 24 weeks. Families in the gamification arm could earn points and progress through levels based on physical activity goal achievement during the 12-week intervention. The game design was meant to enhance collaboration, accountability, and peer support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of participant-days that step goals were achieved during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of participant-days that step goals were achieved during the follow-up period and the change in the mean daily steps during the intervention and follow-up periods. Results: Among 200 adults comprising 94 families, the mean age was 55.4 years, and 56.0% (n = 112) were female. During the intervention period, participants in the gamification arm achieved step goals on a significantly greater proportion of participant-days (0.53 vs 0.32; adjusted difference, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.20-0.33; P < .001) and had a significantly greater increase in the mean daily steps compared with baseline (1661 vs 636; adjusted difference, 953; 95% CI, 505-1401; P < .001) than the control arm. During the follow-up period, physical activity in the gamification arm declined but remained significantly greater than that in the control arm for the proportion of participant-days achieving step goals (0.44 vs 0.33; adjusted difference, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05-0.19; P < .001) and the mean daily steps compared with baseline (1385 vs 798; adjusted difference, 494; 95% CI, 170-818; P < .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Gamification designed to leverage insights from behavioral economics to enhance social incentives significantly increased physical activity among families in the community. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02531763.

Indexed as

ExerciseFamily HealthGames, ExperimentalMotivationFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryWalking

Identifiers

PMID28973115
PMCPMC5710273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.