Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973111›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2017

Learning predictive statistics from temporal sequences: Dynamics and strategies.

Rui Wang, Yuan Shen, Peter Tino, Andrew E Welchman, Zoe Kourtzi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611788 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled108ConditionsHealthyArmsStructure Learning Training
NCT07556250 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Cognitive Flexibility Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled225ConditionsHealthyArmsExperimental (Implicit Training): Structure Learning Training, Active Control (Explicit Training): 'All You Can E.T.'
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Flexible structure learning under uncertainty.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional brain networks for learning predictive statistics.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rui WangKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuan ShenDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.
Peter TinoSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew E WelchmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H012508/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095183/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human behavior is guided by our expectations about the future. Often, we make predictions by monitoring how event sequences unfold, even though such sequences may appear incomprehensible. Event structures in the natural environment typically vary in complexity, from simple repetition to complex probabilistic combinations. How do we learn these structures? Here we investigate the dynamics of structure learning by tracking human responses to temporal sequences that change in structure unbeknownst to the participants. Participants were asked to predict the upcoming item following a probabilistic sequence of symbols. Using a Markov process, we created a family of sequences, from simple frequency statistics (e.g., some symbols are more probable than others) to context-based statistics (e.g., symbol probability is contingent on preceding symbols). We demonstrate the dynamics with which individuals adapt to changes in the environment's statistics-that is, they extract the behaviorally relevant structures to make predictions about upcoming events. Further, we show that this structure learning relates to individual decision strategy; faster learning of complex structures relates to selection of the most probable outcome in a given context (maximizing) rather than matching of the exact sequence statistics. Our findings provide evidence for alternate routes to learning of behaviorally relevant statistics that facilitate our ability to predict future events in variable environments.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnticipation, PsychologicalCerebral CortexComputer SimulationDecision MakingFemaleHumansLearningMaleMarkov ChainsPattern Recognition, VisualYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28973111
PMCPMC5627678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.