Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973084›Full record

SynthesisJAMA psychiatry2017

Heterogeneity and Homogeneity of Regional Brain Structure in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis.

Stefan P Brugger, Oliver D Howes

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 28 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. White-matter free-water diffusion MRI in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan P BruggerDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, England.
Oliver D HowesMedical Research Council London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700995Medical Research Council MC_U120097115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Schizophrenia is associated with alterations in mean regional brain volumes. However, it is not known whether the clinical heterogeneity seen in the disorder is reflected at the neurobiological level, for example, in differences in the interindividual variability of these brain volumes relative to control individuals. Objective: To investigate whether patients with first-episode schizophrenia exhibit greater variability of regional brain volumes in addition to mean volume differences. Data Sources: Studies that reported regional brain volumetric measures in patients and controls by using magnetic resonance imaging in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases from inception to October 1, 2016, were examined. Study Selection: Case-control studies that reported regional brain volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and healthy controls by using magnetic resonance imaging were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Means and variances (SDs) were extracted for each measure to calculate effect sizes, which were combined using multivariate meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relative variability of regional brain volumetric measurements in patients compared with control groups as indexed by the variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). Hedges g was used to quantify mean differences. Results: A total of 108 studies that reported measurements from 3901 patients (1272 [32.6%] female) with first-episode schizophrenia and 4040 controls (1613 [39.9%] female) were included in the analyses. Variability of putamen (VR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24; P = .01), temporal lobe (VR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21; P = .004), thalamus (VR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.26; P < .001), and third ventricle (VR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20-1.71; P < 1 × 10-5) volume was significantly greater in patients, whereas variability of anterior cingulate cortex volume was lower (VR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98; P = .02). These findings were robust to choice of outcome measure. There was no evidence of altered variability of caudate nucleus or frontal lobe volumes. Mean volumes of the lateral (g = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.51; P < .001) and third ventricles (g = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .001) were greater, whereas mean volumes of the amygdala (g = -0.46; -0.65 to -0.26; P < .001), anterior cingulate cortex (g = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.10; P = .005), frontal lobe (g = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.19; P = .001), hippocampus (g = -0.66; 95% CI, -0.84 to -0.47; P < .001), temporal lobe (g = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.09; P = .001), and thalamus (g = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.15; P = .001) were lower in patients. There was no evidence of altered mean volume of caudate nucleus or putamen. Conclusions and Relevance: In addition to altered mean volume of many brain structures, schizophrenia is associated with significantly greater variability of temporal cortex, thalamus, putamen, and third ventricle volumes, consistent with biological heterogeneity in these regions, but lower variability of anterior cingulate cortex volume. This finding indicates greater homogeneity of anterior cingulate volume and, considered with the significantly lower mean volume of this region, suggests that this is a core region affected by the disorder.

Indexed as

BrainCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID28973084
PMCPMC5669456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.