Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973076›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2017

Effect of Dietary Supplementation With Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and ω-3 on Macular Pigment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jean-François Korobelnik, Marie-Bénédicte Rougier, Marie-Noëlle Delyfer, Alain Bron, Bénédicte M J Merle, Hélène Savel, Geneviève Chêne, Cécile Delcourt, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01269697 (Lutein Influence on Macula of Persons Issued From Amd Parents), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01269697 phase3completednot on this map

Lutein Influence on Macula of Persons Issued From Amd Parents

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2011 to 2013Enrolled120ConditionsPersons Issued From Amd ParentsArmsNutrof Total, Placebo Nutrof total
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-François KorobelnikService d'Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Bénédicte RougierService d'Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Noëlle DelyferService d'Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Alain BronService d'Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Bénédicte M J MerleUniversitaire Bordeaux, Institut National de la Santé et de la Récherche Médicale, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Lifelong Exposures Health and Aging (LEHA), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1219, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène SavelCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique and Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC) 1401-Epidémiologie Clinique (EC), Bordeaux, France.
Geneviève ChêneUniversitaire Bordeaux, Institut National de la Santé et de la Récherche Médicale, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Lifelong Exposures Health and Aging (LEHA), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1219, Bordeaux, France.
Cécile DelcourtUniversitaire Bordeaux, Institut National de la Santé et de la Récherche Médicale, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Lifelong Exposures Health and Aging (LEHA), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1219, Bordeaux, France.
Catherine Creuzot-GarcherCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique and Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC) 1401-Epidémiologie Clinique (EC), Bordeaux, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Nutritional uptake of lutein, zeaxanthin, and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may increase macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and thereby protect against the development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Objectives: To estimate the efficiency of dietary supplementation containing lutein, zeaxanthin, ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamins to increase the density of macular pigment in first-generation offspring of parents with neovascular AMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a randomized clinical trial (Lutein Influence on Macula of Persons Issued From AMD Parents [LIMPIA]) with a 6-month treatment period, followed by a 6-month follow-up period. Analyses were based on the intent-to-treat principle. The setting was 2 university hospitals in France (at Bordeaux and Dijon) from January 2011 (first participant first visit) to February 2013 (last participant last visit). The analysis was conducted from January to November 2016. Participants were 120 individuals free of any retinal ocular disease. They were first-generation offspring of parents with neovascular AMD. Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 2 daily dietary supplementation capsules or placebo for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary assessment criterion was the evolution of MPOD after 6 months of supplementation (value of both eligible eyes) measured using the modified MPD-Visucam 200 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the modified Heidelberg Retina Angiograph (Heidelberg Engineering) (HRA) at 0.98° eccentricity. The statistical analysis was adjusted for hospital and for risk factors. Results: Overall, 120 participants (60 in each group) were included, and 239 eyes were analyzed (119 in the lutein plus zeaxanthin [L + Z] group and 120 in the placebo group). Their mean (SD) age was 56.7 (6.6) years, and 71.7% (n = 86) were female. A statistically significant increase in plasma lutein and zeaxanthin was shown in the L + Z group after 3 months and 6 months of treatment compared with the placebo group. However, the difference between groups in the evolution of MPOD measured by HRA 0.98° eccentricity between 6 months and baseline was 0.036 (95% CI, -0.037 to 0.110) (P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance: Among first-generation offspring of parents with neovascular AMD in the LIMPIA trial, MPOD as measured with the modified HRA and the MPD-Visucam was not modified after 6 months of lutein and zeaxanthin dietary supplementation despite plasma levels showing continuous exposure to lutein and zeaxanthin. Further research is necessary to understand the mechanism of absorption and metabolism of these nutrients in the macula, the best way to measure MPOD, and the clinical benefit for the patients. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01269697.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLuteinMacula LuteaMacular PigmentMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmoscopyFatty Acids, Omega-3LuteinMacular PigmentVitaminsZeaxanthins

Identifiers

PMID28973076
PMCPMC5710391
OpenAlexW2760580504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.