ArticlePloS one2017
Reconsidering lactate as a sepsis risk biomarker.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between the lactate to creatinine ratio and hospital mortality in patients with pediatric sepsis: a cohort study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Review
- Developing an early warning system for detecting sepsis in patients with trauma.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Distinct subsets of neutrophils crosstalk with cytokines and metabolites in patients with sepsis.iScience · 2023Article
- Modelling hospital outcome: problems with endogeneity.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- The Association of Serum Lactate Level with the Occurrence of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Utility of Delta Lactate for Predicting Early In-Hospital Mortality in Adult Patients: A Prospective, Multicentric, Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Association between serum lactate levels and enteral feeding intolerance in septic patients treated with vasopressors: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- The predictive value of variables measurable in the ambulance and the development of the Predict Sepsis screening tools: a prospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Observational
- Biomarkers and Associated Immune Mechanisms for Early Detection and Therapeutic Management of Sepsis.Immune network · 2020Review
- 17β-Estradiol Promotes Trained Immunity in Females Against Sepsis via Regulating Nucleus Translocation of RelB.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Prediction of median survival time in sepsis patients by the SOFA score combined with different predictors.Burns & trauma · 2020Article
- Pentraxin-3, procalcitonin and lactate as prognostic markers in patients with sepsis and septic shock.Oncotarget · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere has been renewed interest in lactate as a risk biomarker in sepsis and septic shock. However, the ability of the odds ratio (OR) and change in the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) to assess biomarker added-value has been questioned. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsA sepsis cohort was identified from the ICU database of an Australian tertiary referral hospital using APACHE III diagnostic codes. Demographic information, APACHE III scores, 24-hour post-admission patient lactate levels, and hospital mortality were accessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsHospital mortality was modelled using a base predictive logistic regression model and sequential addition of admission lactate, lactate clearance ([lactateadmission-lactatefinal]/lactateadmission), and area under the lactate-time curve (LTC). Added-value was assessed using lactate index OR; AUC-ROC difference (base-model versus lactate index addition); net (mortality) reclassification index (NRI; range -2 to +2); and net benefit (NB), the number of true positives per patient adjusted for the number of false positives. The data set comprised 717 patients with mean(SD) age and APACHE III score 61.1(16.5) years and 68.3(28.2) respectively; 59.2% were male. Admission lactate was 2.3(2.5) mmol/l; with lactate of ≥ 4 mmol/L (37% hospital mortality) in 17% and patients with lactate < 4 mmol/L having 18% hospital mortality. The admission base-model had an AUC-ROC = 0.81 with admission lactate OR = 1.127 (95%CI: 1.038, 1.224), AUC-ROC difference of 0.0032 (-0.0037, 0.01615; P = 0.61), and NRI 0.240(0.030, 0.464). The over-time model had an AUC-ROC = 0.86 with (i) clearance OR = 0.771, 95%CI: 0.578, 1.030; P = 0.08; AUC-ROC difference 0.001 (-0.003, 0.014; P = 0.78), and NRI 0.109(-0.193, 0.425) and (ii) LTC OR = 0.997, 95%CI: 0.989, 1.005, P = 0.49; AUC-ROC difference 0.004 (-0.002, 0.004; P = 0.34), and NRI 0.111(-0.222, 0.403). NB was not incremented by any lactate index.
conclusionsLactate added-value assessment is dependent upon the performance of the underlying predictive model and should incorporate risk reclassification and net benefit measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.