Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28972818›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2017

Neuron-Specific Enolase as an Immunohistochemical Marker Is Better Than Its Reputation.

Patricia Mjønes, Liv Sagatun, Ivar S Nordrum, Helge L Waldum

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Human Meningiomas Reveal No Evidence of Neuroendocrine Differentiation.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neoplasia in the dromedary camel: a review (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neuron-Specific Enolase-What Are We Measuring?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Multifaceted modeling of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia MjønesDepartment of Pathology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Liv SagatunDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Ivar S NordrumDepartment of Pathology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Helge L WaldumDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) may be challenging and is based on typical morphological features and positive staining for antibodies of neuroendocrine differentiation. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) being a cytosolic marker may be useful in this setting. NSE is by many considered nonspecific, due to the finding of this marker in tumors considered not to be of neuroendocrine origin. Our aim was to determine whether this is true and whether NSE is more specific than previously realized. We examined 178 tumors (carcinomas and NENs) from breast, lung, stomach, and kidney using immunohistochemistry with the following markers: chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD56, secretagogin, and NSE. Expression of NSE was compared with that of the other markers. NSE was expressed in 138 (78%) of all tumors. Of the NSE-expressing tumors, 95 (68%) cases expressed one or more additional neuroendocrine markers. The staining intensity and number of NSE-expressing tumor cells were highest among tumors of neuroendocrine origin and clear cell renal cell carcinomas. A positive association was found between NSE expression and the number of additional neuroendocrine markers expressed in each of the tumors. Practically all tumors positive for an accepted neuroendocrine marker also expressed NSE.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCell DifferentiationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhosphopyruvate HydrataseBiomarkers, TumorPhosphopyruvate HydratasecarcinoidCgAchromogranin Aneuroendocrine tumorneuron-specific enolaseNSEsecretagoginsynaptophysin

Identifiers

PMID28972818
PMCPMC5714096
OpenAlexW2763879761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.