Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28972809›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia: CT findings, clinical outcomes and assessment of the diameter of the superior mesenteric artery.

Carlos Pérez-García, Enrique de Miguel Campos, Adriana Fernández Gonzalo, Carlos Malfaz, Jesus Javier Martín Pinacho, Carmen Fernández Álvarez, Raquel Herranz Pérez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Changes in Abdominal Artery Diameter in Patients Treated for Acute Aortic Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Computed Tomography Imaging of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia for Interventional Radiology.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025
    Review
  15. Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia: A Review for Interventional Radiologists.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025
    Review
  16. Computed Tomography Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Pérez-García1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique de Miguel Campos1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Adriana Fernández Gonzalo1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Malfaz1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Jesus Javier Martín Pinacho1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Fernández Álvarez1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Herranz Pérez2 Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReview of the experience of a tertiary care centre for almost 10 years in the CT diagnosis of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI). Analysis of CT findings, correlation with clinical outcomes and evaluation of the usefulness of measuring the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) diameter for the diagnosis of NOMI.

methods106 patients were diagnosed with NOMI in a biphasic CT examination from 2008 to 2017 in our hospital. Clinical outcomes and CT findings were reviewed. In 55 patients, the diameter of the SMA was compared with a previous CT scan where NOMI was not the diagnosis, and statistical analysis using paired t-test was performed.

results81 patients (76%) had findings consistent with small bowel ischaemia and the ileum was the segment most commonly involved (47%). Lack of wall enhancement, pneumoperitoneum, pneumatosis intestinalis and portal venous gas were all considered signs of bowel necrosis and surgery was performed promptly. 70 patients had signs of vascular narrowing of the SMA branches and in the 55 cases with a previous CT scan, there were statistically significant differences regarding the SMA diameter with a mean reduction of the artery calibre and standard deviation of 1.93 ± 1.1 mm between the NOMI and non-NOMI scans (p < 0.001).

conclusionAcknowledgment of characteristic bowel necrosis CT findings is crucial for determining the therapeutic attitude and the use of previous CT scans to compare the SMA diameter may help the radiologist to achieve an early diagnosis of NOMI in an often critically ill patient population. Advances in knowledge: Diagnosis of NOMI can be difficult in cases of partial mural ischaemia, thus objective data (diameter of the SMA) should be useful for the radiologist to include NOMI as the first diagnostic option in the differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansIntestinal PerforationIntestinesMaleMesenteric Artery, SuperiorMesenteric IschemiaNecrosisPneumoperitoneumRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28972809
PMCPMC5966212
OpenAlexW2761423258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.