ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017
The future of interventional and neurointerventional radiology: learning lessons from the past.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Job satisfaction and factors involved in transitioning from the clinical practice of interventional radiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Trainee and Faculty Perspectives of Neurointerventional Curricula in Residency: a Scoping Review.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- IR beyond the procedure: mastering patient and team management.CVIR endovascular · 2025Review
- CLINTERVENTIONAL protocol: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical consultations and audiovisual tools for interventional radiology.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Longitudinal investigation of undergraduates' radiation anxiety, interest, and career intention in interventional radiology.European radiology · 2024Article
- Review
- When the interventional radiologist competes with the orthopaedic surgeon.European radiology · 2024Article
- Experience and results after the implementation of a radiology day unit in a reference hospital.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Attracting the next generation of radiologists: a statement by the European Society of Radiology (ESR).Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Optimising access and provision of interventional radiology service to patients by utilising a new referral system.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- CIRSE Clinical Practice Manual.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Article
- Real-time device tracking under MRI using an acousto-optic active marker.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Investigating the parameters that affect the radiation exposure and establishing typical values based on procedure complexity for cerebral angiography and brain aneurysm embolization.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.PloS one · 2021Article
- Endovascular simulation training: a tool to increase enthusiasm for interventional radiology among medical students.European radiology · 2020Article
- A prospective study integrating a curriculum of interventional radiology in undergraduate education: a tetra-core simulation model.CVIR endovascular · 2020Article
- Awareness of interventional radiology before professional training and outcome measurement of an interventional radiology curriculum: a survey of third-year undergraduates in a Chinese medical college.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid progression of medical imaging technology and the ability to leverage knowledge from non-invasive imaging means that Interventional Radiologists (IRs) and Interventional Neuroradiologists are optimally placed to incorporate minimally invasive interventional paradigms into clinical management to advance patient care. There is ample opportunity to radically change the management options for patients with a variety of diseases through the use of minimally invasive interventional procedures. However, this will need to be accompanied by an increased clinical role of IRs to become active partners in the clinical management of patients. Unfortunately, the development of IR clinical presence has lagged behind and is reflected by declining rates of IR involvement in certain areas of practice such as vascular interventions. Current and future IRs must be willing to take on clinical responsibilities; reviewing patients in clinic to determine suitability for a procedure and potential contraindications, rounding on hospital inpatients and be willing to manage procedure related complications, which are all important parts of a successful IR practice. Increasing our clinical presence has several advantages over the procedure-driven model including enhanced patient knowledge and informed consent for IR procedures, improved rapport with patients and other clinical colleagues through active participation and engagement in patient care, visibility as a means to facilitate referrals and consistency of follow-up with opportunities for further learning. Many of the solutions to these problems are already in progress and the use of IR as a "hired gun" or "technician" is a concept that should be relegated to the past, and replaced with recognition of IRs as clinicians and partners in delivering modern high quality multidisciplinary team-based patient care. The following article will review the history of IR, the challenges facing this rapidly evolving profession and discuss recent developments occurring globally that are essential in maintaining expertise, securing future growth and improving patient outcomes in the modern multidisciplinary practice of medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.