Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28972531›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2017

Libraries and Librarians: Key Partners for Progress in Health Literacy Research and Practice.

Wanda Whitney, Alla Keselman, Betsy Humphreys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Census Tract Demographics Associated with Libraries' Social, Economic, and Health-Related Programming.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using focus groups to evaluate a multiyear consumer health outreach collaboration.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wanda WhitneyNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.
Alla KeselmanNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.
Betsy HumphreysNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of librarianship has a history of involvement in patient education, general literacy and information literacy efforts. This history and prominent placement in communities make libraries and librarians an excellent resource in advancing health literacy practice and research. This chapter provides an overview of health literacy and health information literacy efforts in US libraries over the past two decades. The chapter begins with the description of the role of the US National Library of Medicine in developing resources, programs, and partnerships serving health information needs of the public. It then overviews special training programs for increasing librarians' expertise with health information and health literacy support. The narrative also presents different models of health information outreach programs in diverse communities, focusing on serving special populations that may suffer from health disparities. The second half of the chapter describes libraries' and librarians' health information response to continuously evolving contexts, mediums, and requirements. One subsection describes librarians' outreach effort with cutting-edge technologies, such as virtual worlds and gaming. Another focuses on supporting patients' information needs in clinical settings. Two more describe how libraries meet patrons' health information needs in the context of disaster preparedness and health insurance market place sign-up. While presenting the information, to the extent possible, the chapter draws upon research and evaluation of the effectiveness of different types of programs. It also discusses enablers of successes, limitations of the existing data, and directions for future research.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyLibrariansLibrary ScienceHumansLibraries, MedicalResearchHealth information literacyHealth information outreachHealth literacyLibrariesPatient educationU.S. National Library of Medicine

Identifiers

PMID28972531
PMCPMC5724359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.