Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28972524›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2017

Engaging Patients in Decision-Making and Behavior Change to Promote Prevention.

Alex H Krist, Sebastian T Tong, Rebecca A Aycock, Daniel R Longo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Patient's Voice in Advanced Practice Nursing: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Lived Experiences.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frameworks for Action: A Scoping Review of Organisational Patient Engagement Models in Healthcare.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex H KristDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA.
Sebastian T TongDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA.
Rebecca A AycockDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA.
Daniel R LongoDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer ScreeningR01CA168795 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effectively engaging patients in their care is essential to improve health outcomes, improve satisfaction with the care experience, reduce costs, and even benefit the clinician experience. This chapter will address the topic of patient engagement directly and review the relationships between health literacy and patient engagement. While there are many ways to define patient and family engagement, this chapter will consider engagement as "patients, families, their representatives, and health professionals working in active partnership at various levels across the health care system - direct care, organizational design and governance, and policy making - to improve health and health care [1]." We will specifically focus on the patient engagement and health literacy needs for three scenarios (1) decision-making, (2) health behavior change, and (3) chronic disease management; we will include the theoretical underpinnings of engagement, the systems required to better support patient engagement, how social determinants of health influence patient engagement, and practical examples to demonstrate approaches to better engage patients in their health and wellbeing. We will close by describing the future of patient engagement, which extends beyond the traditional domains of decision-making and self-care to describe how patient engagement can influence the design of the healthcare delivery system; local, state, and national health policies; and future research relevant to the needs and experiences of patients.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth PolicyPolicy MakingDelivery of Health CareHumansSelf Caredelivery of healthcarehealth literacypatient activationpatient educationPatient engagementshared decision makingsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID28972524
PMCPMC6996004
OpenAlexW2937252947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.