Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28972152›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

Mutant cycle analysis identifies a ligand interaction site in an odorant receptor of the malaria vector

Suhaila Rahman, Charles W Luetje

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The Art and Science of Molecular Docking.Annual review of biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. A tale of two copies: Evolutionary trajectories of moth pheromone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suhaila RahmanFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101.
Charles W LuetjeFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101 cluetje@med.miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7192-6674
University of Miami · US

Funding

Binding Site Structure of Insect Odorant Receptors.R01DC011091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUETJE, CHARLES WARD · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of information about the structure of insect odorant receptors (ORs) hinders the development of more effective repellants to control disease-transmitting insects. Mutagenesis and functional analyses using agonists to map the odorant-binding sites of these receptors have been limited because mutations distant from an agonist-binding site can alter agonist sensitivity. Here we use mutant cycle analysis, an approach for exploring the energetics of protein-protein or protein-ligand interactions, with inhibitors, to identify a component of the odorant-binding site of an OR from the malaria vector,

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesBinding SitesHumansInsect ControlInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsLigandsMalariaMosquito VectorsOdorantsReceptors, OdorantSmellXenopusInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsLigandsReceptors, OdorantelectrophysiologyinsectolfactionoocytereceptorstructureXenopus

Identifiers

PMID28972152
PMCPMC5704475
OpenAlexW2758138832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.