Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971877›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

R K Flamm, P R Rhomberg, H S Sader

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Membrane-Focused Strategies AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Staph wars: the antibiotic pipeline strikes back.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  7. Design and Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial Agents.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Article
  10. Antimicrobial Activity of Lactones.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R K FlammJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA robert-flamm@jmilabs.com.
P R RhombergJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
H S SaderJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
JMI Laboratories · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nafithromycin (WCK 4873), a novel antimicrobial agent of the lactone ketolide class, is currently in phase 2 development for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). A total of 4,739 nonduplicate isolates were selected from a 2014 global surveillance program at medical institutions located in 43 countries within the United States, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Nafithromycin and comparator agents were used for susceptibility testing by reference broth microdilution methods. Nafithromycin was active against

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHaemophilus influenzaeHumansKetolidesLactonesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoraxella catarrhalisPneumonia, BacterialStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcus pyogenesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsKetolidesLactonesnafithromycinketolidesStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcus pyogenes

Identifiers

PMID28971877
PMCPMC5700335
OpenAlexW2762717022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.