Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971871›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

New Variant of

Lu Liu, Yu Feng, Xiaoxia Zhang, Alan McNally, Zhiyong Zong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of anAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Co-Existence ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mobile Colistin Resistance (Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. More thanFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Global epidemiology, genetic environment, risk factors and therapeutic prospects ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistanceFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Colistin resistance and plasmid-mediatedJournal of veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Molecular Investigation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lu LiuCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu FengCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoxia ZhangCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Alan McNallyInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Zhiyong ZongCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China zongzhiy@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A colistin- and carbapenem-resistant

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAmino Acid SubstitutionAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesColistinDNA Transposable ElementsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationPlasmidsProtein IsoformsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta lactamase NDM-5, E colibeta-LactamasesColistinDNA Transposable ElementsEscherichia coli ProteinsMCR-1 protein, E coliProtein IsoformscolistinEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliplasmidsresistance

Identifiers

PMID28971871
PMCPMC5700326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.