Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971863›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Dispersed Cells to Antimicrobial Agents Is Dependent on the Dispersion Cue and Class of the Antimicrobial Agent Used.

Jacob R Chambers, Kathryn E Cherny, Karin Sauer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biofilm dispersion byJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  2. Biofilm dispersion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptional profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Multidrug-resistantVirulence · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob R ChambersBinghamton Biofilm Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Kathryn E ChernyBinghamton Biofilm Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Karin SauerBinghamton Biofilm Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA ksauer@binghamton.edu.
Binghamton University · US

Funding

Role of PA4878 in biofilm antimicrobial resistanceR01AI080710 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI LAU, GEE W, SAUER, KARIN · 2009 to 2020
$3.1M
Role of BdlA in biofilm dispersion and virulence properties of P. aeruginosaR01AI075257 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SAUER, KARIN · 2009 to 2012
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI075257NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biofilm life cycle is characterized by the transition of planktonic cells exhibiting high susceptibly to antimicrobial agents to a biofilm mode of growth characterized by high tolerance to antimicrobials, followed by dispersion of cells from the biofilm back into the environment. Dispersed cells, however, are not identical to planktonic cells but have been characterized as having a unique transitionary phenotype relative to biofilm and planktonic cells, with dispersed cells attaching in a manner similar to exponential-phase cells, but demonstrating gene expression patterns that are distinct from both exponential and stationary-phase planktonic cells. This raised the question whether dispersed cells are as susceptible as planktonic cells and whether the dispersion inducer or the antibiotic class affects the drug susceptibility of dispersed cells. Dispersed cells obtained in response to dispersion cues glutamate and nitric oxide (NO) were thus exposed to tobramycin and colistin. Although NO-induced dispersed cells were as susceptible to colistin and tobramycin as exponential-phase planktonic cells, glutamate-induced dispersed cells were susceptible to tobramycin but resistant to colistin. The difference in colistin susceptibility was independent of cellular c-di-GMP levels, with modulation of c-di-GMP failing to induce dispersion. Instead, drug susceptibility was inversely correlated with LPS modification system and the biofilm-specific transcriptional regulator BrlR. The susceptibility phenotype of glutamate-induced dispersed cells to colistin was found to be reversible, with dispersed cells being rendered as susceptible to colistin within 2 h postdispersion, though additional time was required for dispersed cells to display expression of genes indicative of exponential growth.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsColistinCyclic GMPDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGlutamic AcidHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaTobramycinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbis(3',5')-cyclic diguanylic acidColistinCyclic GMPGlutamic AcidTobramycinattachmentbiofilmbiofilm controlcolistindispersionexponential phasesusceptibilitytobramycin

Identifiers

PMID28971863
PMCPMC5700346
OpenAlexW2762176989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.