Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971861›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Pharmacokinetic Properties of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Candidiasis.

J M Boonstra, K C van der Elst, A Veringa, E M Jongedijk, R J Brüggemann, R A Koster, G A Kampinga, J G Kosterink, T S van der Werf, J G Zijlstra and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J M BoonstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
K C van der ElstUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
A VeringaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
E M JongedijkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
R J BrüggemannUniversity of Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, and Center of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-725X
R A KosterUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
G A KampingaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J G KosterinkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
T S van der WerfUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J G ZijlstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Critical Care, Groningen, the Netherlands.
D J TouwUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J W C AlffenaarUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands j.w.c.alffenaar@umcg.nl.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimated attributable mortality rate for invasive candidiasis (IC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting varies from 30 to 40%. Physiological changes in critically ill patients may affect the distribution and elimination of micafungin, and therefore, dosing adjustments might be mandatory. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of micafungin in critically ill patients and assess the probability of target attainment. Micafungin plasma concentrations were measured to estimate the pharmacokinetic properties of micafungin. MIC values for

Indexed as

AgedAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityBody WeightCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandidiasis, InvasiveCase-Control StudiesCritical IllnessDrug Dosage CalculationsEchinocandinsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLipopeptidesAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafungincritically illinvasive candidiasismicafunginpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28971861
PMCPMC5700342
OpenAlexW2762086739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.