Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971682›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2017

Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and Belief.

Albert A Koelmans, Ellen Besseling, Edwin Foekema, Merel Kooi, Svenja Mintenig, Bernadette C Ossendorp, Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm, Anja Verschoor, Annemarie P van Wezel, Marten Scheffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A global ranking of the relative vulnerability of marine mammals to macroplastic pollution.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Albert A KoelmansAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University & Research , P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-4356
Ellen BesselingAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University & Research , P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-2173
Edwin FoekemaWageningen Marine Research , Den Helder, The Netherlands.
Merel KooiAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University & Research , P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Svenja MintenigKWR Watercycle Research Institute , Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Bernadette C OssendorpNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Paula E Redondo-HasselerharmAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University & Research , P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anja VerschoorNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Annemarie P van WezelKWR Watercycle Research Institute , Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Marten SchefferAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University & Research , P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researcher and media alarms have caused plastic debris to be perceived as a major threat to humans and animals. However, although the waste of plastic in the environment is clearly undesirable for aesthetic and economic reasons, the actual environmental risks of different plastics and their associated chemicals remain largely unknown. Here we show how a systematic assessment of adverse outcome pathways based on ecologically relevant metrics for exposure and effect can bring risk assessment within reach. Results of such an assessment will help to respond to the current public worry in a balanced way and allow policy makers to take measures for scientifically sound reasons.

Indexed as

PlasticsWaste ProductsAnimalsAttitudeEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRiskPlasticsWaste Products

Identifiers

PMID28971682
PMCPMC5677762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.