Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971335›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018

Digital Waveform Technology and the Next Generation of Mass Spectrometers.

Nathan M Hoffman, Zachary P Gotlib, Bojana Opačić, Adam P Huntley, Ashley M Moon, Katherine E G Donahoe, Gregory F Brabeck, Peter T A Reilly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implementing Digital-Waveform Technology for ExtendedJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan M HoffmanDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Zachary P GotlibDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Bojana OpačićDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Adam P HuntleyDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Ashley M MoonDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Katherine E G DonahoeDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Gregory F BrabeckDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA.
Peter T A ReillyDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Fulmer 104B, Pullman, WA, 99164-4630, USA. pete.reilly@wsu.edu.

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency HDTRA1-12-0015National Foundation for Science and Technology Development 1352780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ion traps and guides are integral parts of current commercial mass spectrometers. They are currently operated with sinusoidal waveform technology that has been developed over many years. Recently, digital waveform technology has begun to emerge and promises to supplant its older cousin because it presents new capabilities that result from the ability to instantaneously switch the frequency and duty cycle of the waveforms. This manuscript examines these capabilities and reveals their uses and effects on instrumentation. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Digital waveform technologyIon traps and guidesStability diagrams

Identifiers

PMID28971335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.