ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2018
Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Coding of Fundamental Frequency and Processing of Discrete Pitch Accents in Middle Age.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- The auditory brainstem response to natural speech is not affected by selective attention.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Large-scale multi-site study shows no association between musical training and early auditory neural sound encoding.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Musicianship Modulates Cortical Effects of Attention on Processing Musical Triads.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Musical training does not enhance neural sound encoding at early stages of the auditory system: A large-scale multisite investigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Gamma-Band Auditory Steady-State Response and Attention: A Systemic Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Neural hyperactivity and altered envelope encoding in the central auditory system: Changes with advanced age and hearing loss.Hearing research · 2024Review
- Short- and long-term neuroplasticity interact during the perceptual learning of concurrent speech.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Cortical Responses Time-Locked to Continuous Speech in the High-Gamma Band Depend on Selective Attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures of Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Normal-hearing Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Article
- Cortical responses time-locked to continuous speech in the high-gamma band depend on selective attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brainstem speech encoding is dynamically shaped online by fluctuations in cortical α state.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- The effects of data quantity on performance of temporal response function analyses of natural speech processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG.Current research in neurobiology · 2022Article
- Time-locked auditory cortical responses in the high-gamma band: A window into primary auditory cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directing attention to sounds of different frequencies allows listeners to perceive a sound of interest, like a talker, in a mixture. Whether cortically generated frequency-specific attention affects responses as low as the auditory brainstem is currently unclear. Participants attended to either a high- or low-frequency tone stream, which was presented simultaneously and tagged with different amplitude modulation (AM) rates. In a replication design, we showed that envelope-following responses (EFRs) were modulated by attention only when the stimulus AM rate was slow enough for the auditory cortex to track-and not for stimuli with faster AM rates, which are thought to reflect 'purer' brainstem sources. Thus, we found no evidence of frequency-specific attentional modulation that can be confidently attributed to brainstem generators. The results demonstrate that different neural populations contribute to EFRs at higher and lower rates, compatible with cortical contributions at lower rates. The results further demonstrate that stimulus AM rate can alter conclusions of EFR studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.