Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971266›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Automated direct screening for resistance of Gram-negative blood cultures using the BD Kiestra WorkCell.

C S Heather, M Maley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positive Flagged Blood Cultures in Sepsis Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) for positive blood cultures in clinical practice using a total lab automation.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) directly from blood culture bottles.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C S HeatherDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, NSW Health Pathology South-Liverpool, Liverpool Hospital, Corner Goulburn and Forbes Street, Liverpool, NSW, Australia. christopher.heather@health.nsw.gov.au.
M MaleyDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, NSW Health Pathology South-Liverpool, Liverpool Hospital, Corner Goulburn and Forbes Street, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Liverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of resistance in sepsis due to Gram-negative organisms may lead to improved outcomes by reducing the time to effective antibiotic therapy. Traditional methods of resistance detection require incubation times of 18 to 48 h to detect resistance. We have utilised automated specimen processing, digital imaging and zone size measurements in conjunction with direct disc susceptibility testing to develop a method for the rapid screening of Gram-negative blood culture isolates for resistance. Positive clinical blood cultures with Gram-negative organisms were prospectively identified and additional resistant mock specimens were prepared. Broth was plated and antibiotic-impregnated discs (ampicillin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin) were added. Plates were incubated, digitally imaged and zone sizes were measured using the BD Kiestra WorkCell laboratory automation system. Minimum, clinically useful, incubation times and optimised zone size cut-offs for resistance detection were determined. We included 187 blood cultures in the study. At 5 h of incubation, > 90% of plates yielded interpretable results. Using optimised zone size cut-offs, the sensitivity for resistance detection ranged from 87 to 100%, while the specificity ranged from 84.7 to 100%. The sensitivity and specificity for piperacillin-tazobactam resistance detection was consistently worse than for the other agents. Automated direct disc susceptibility screening is a rapid and sensitive tool for resistance detection in Gram-negative isolates from blood cultures for most of the agents tested.

Indexed as

AmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBlood CultureCeftriaxoneCiprofloxacinDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDrug Resistance, BacterialGentamicinsGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMeropenemPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationThienamycinsAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCiprofloxacinGentamicinsMeropenemPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID28971266
OpenAlexW2763549476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.