Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28971016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2017

Prevalence of avian haemosporidia among injured wild birds in Tokyo and environs, Japan.

Mizue Inumaru, Koichi Murata, Yukita Sato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High Prevalence ofJournal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence and genetic diversity ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  20. First records of prevalence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in snipe species (genusInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mizue InumaruLaboratory of Biomedical Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa 252-0880, Japan.
Koichi MurataLaboratory of Wildlife Science, Department of Animal Resource Sciences, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa 252-0880, Japan.
Yukita SatoLaboratory of Biomedical Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa 252-0880, Japan.
Nihon University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian haemosporidia have been reported in various birds of Japan, which is part of the East Asian-Australian flyway and is an important stopover site for migratory birds potentially carrying new pathogens from other areas. We investigated the prevalence of avian malaria in injured wild birds, rescued in Tokyo and surrounding areas. We also evaluated the effects of migration by examining the prevalence of avian malaria for each migratory status. 475 birds of 80 species were sampled from four facilities. All samples were examined for haemosporidian infection via nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the cytochrome

Indexed as

Avian haemosporidiaCytochrome bJapanMigratory birdsParasite diversityRescued wild birds

Identifiers

PMID28971016
PMCPMC5614597
OpenAlexW2756952284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.