ReviewScience and technology of advanced materials2017
Understanding biomaterial-tissue interface quality: combined
Review in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antimicrobial additives in resin-based endodontic sealers: a scoping review of antimicrobial efficacy, physicochemical properties, and cytotoxicity.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Critical Questions Surrounding the Shot-Blasting Treatment of Titanium Dental Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A multifunctional scaffold that promotes the scaffold-tissue interface integration and rescues the ROS microenvironment for repair of annulus fibrosus defects.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evaluation of hyperplastic soft tissues surrounding dental implants in fibular jaws.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Zn-doped chitosan/alginate multilayer coatings on porous hydroxyapatite scaffold with osteogenic and antibacterial properties.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Development of an Ingestible Expandable Capsule for Weight Loss.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial effects of hydroxyapatite mosaicked polyvinyl alcohol-alginate semi-interpenetrating hydrogel-loaded with ethanolic extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra against oral pathogens.Progress in biomaterials · 2022Article
- The Role of Interstitial Fluid Pressure in Cerebral Porous Biomaterial Integration.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Benefits of Residual Aluminum Oxide for Sand Blasting Titanium Dental Implants: Osseointegration and Bactericidal Effects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Enhancement of Gingival Tissue Adherence of Zirconia Implant Posts: In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Features of Graphene-Augmented Inorganic Nanofibrous Scaffolds and Their Physical Interaction with Viruses.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Reengineering Bone-Implant Interfaces for Improved Mechanotransduction and Clinical Outcomes.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020Review
- Strategies for Using Polydopamine to Induce Biomineralization of Hydroxyapatite on Implant Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Graphene-Augmented Nanofiber Scaffolds Trigger Gene Expression Switching of Four Cancer Cell Types.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2018Article
- The Importance of Controlled Mismatch of Biomechanical Compliances of Implantable Scaffolds and Native Tissue for Articular Cartilage Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the greatest challenges in the development of new medical products and devices remains in providing maximal patient safety, efficacy and suitability for the purpose. A 'good quality' of the tissue-implant interface is one of the most critical factors for the success of the implant integration. In this paper this challenge is being discussed from the point of view of basic stimuli combination to experimental testing. The focus is in particular on bacterial effects on tissue-implant interaction (for different materials). The demonstration of the experimental evaluation of the tissue-implant interface is for dental abutment with mucosal contact. This shows that testing of the interface quality could be the most relevant in controlled conditions, which mimic as possible the clinical applications, but consider variables being under the control of the evaluator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.