ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017
CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Genome Engineering for Improvement of Horticultural Crops.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genome editing for vegetable crop improvement: Challenges and future prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Genome Editing in Solanaceae: Harnessing CRISPR-Cas Technology for Precision Crop Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Starches From Diverse Millets: Composition, Structure, Functionality, and Strategies for Genetic Improvement.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Metabolic Engineering of Terpenoid Biosynthesis in Medicinal Plants: From Genomic Insights to Biotechnological Applications.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Streamlined protoplast transfection system for in-vivo validation and transgene-free genome editing in Banana.Transgenic research · 2025Article
- Advances in RNA Interference for Plant Functional Genomics: Unveiling Traits, Mechanisms, and Future Directions.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Improvement of crop production in controlled environment agriculture through breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Designing of future ornamental crops: a biotechnological driven perspective.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Quality trait improvement in horticultural crops: OMICS and modern biotechnological approaches.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- Development of an Agrobacterium-delivered codon-optimized CRISPR/Cas9 system for chickpea genome editing.Protoplasma · 2023Article
- Strategies and Methods for Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plant Molecular Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- Functional diversification and molecular mechanisms of FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 family genes in horticultural plants.Molecular horticulture · 2022Review
- CRISPR gene editing of major domestication traits accelerating breeding for Solanaceae crops improvement.Plant molecular biology · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- A glance at the chemodiversity ofPhytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2022Review
- Current Status and Perspectives on the Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene-Editing System to Develop a Low-Gluten, Non-Transgenic Wheat Variety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Responsible governance of gene editing in agriculture and the environment.Nature biotechnology · 2021Article
- Impacts of the regulatory environment for gene editing on delivering beneficial products.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Plant : journal of the Tissue Culture Association · 2021Article
- Applications and Major Achievements of Genome Editing in Vegetable Crops: A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Horticultural crops are an important part of agriculture for food as well as nutritional security. However, several pests and diseases along with adverse abiotic environmental factors pose a severe threat to these crops by affecting their quality and productivity. This warrants the effective and accelerated breeding programs by utilizing innovative biotechnological tools that can tackle aforementioned issues. The recent technique of genome editing by Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) has greatly advanced the breeding for crop improvement due to its simplicity and high efficiency over other nucleases such as Zinc Finger Nucleases and Transcription Activator Like Effector Nucleases. CRISPR/Cas9 tool contains a non-specific Cas9 nuclease and a single guide RNA that directs Cas9 to the specific genomic location creating double-strand breaks and subsequent repair process creates insertion or deletion mutations. This is currently the widely adopted tool for reverse genetics, and crop improvement in large number of agricultural crops. The use of CRISPR/Cas9 in horticultural crops is limited to few crops due to lack of availability of regeneration protocols and sufficient sequence information in many horticultural crops. In this review, the present status of applicability of CRISPR/Cas9 in horticultural crops was discussed along with the challenges and future potential for possible improvement of these crops for their yield, quality, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.