Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28970826›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017

Heterogeneity in Pure Microbial Systems: Experimental Measurements and Modeling.

Rebeca González-Cabaleiro, Anca M Mitchell, Wendy Smith, Anil Wipat, Irina D Ofiţeru

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Microbial single-cell omics: the crux of the matter.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Toward Engineering Biosystems With Emergent Collective Functions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  15. Coculturing Bacteria Leads to Reduced Phenotypic Heterogeneities.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebeca González-CabaleiroSchool of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anca M MitchellSchool of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Wendy SmithInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems (ICOS), School of ComputingNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anil WipatInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems (ICOS), School of ComputingNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Irina D OfiţeruSchool of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity influences bioprocess performance in ways that until date are not completely elucidated. In order to account for this phenomenon in the design and operation of bioprocesses, reliable analytical and mathematical descriptions are required. We present an overview of the single cell analysis, and the mathematical modeling frameworks that have potential to be used in bioprocess control and optimization, in particular for microbial processes. In order to be suitable for bioprocess monitoring, experimental methods need to be high throughput and to require relatively short processing time. One such method used successfully under dynamic conditions is flow cytometry. Population balance and individual based models are suitable modeling options, the latter one having in particular a good potential to integrate the various data collected through experimentation. This will be highly beneficial for appropriate process design and scale up as a more rigorous approach may prevent

Indexed as

flow cytometryindividual based modelspopulation balance modelspopulation heterogeneitysingle cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID28970826
PMCPMC5609101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.