Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28970746›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2017

Electronic Implementation of Integrated End-of-life Care: A Local Approach.

Daniel Schlieper, Christiane Altreuther, Manuela Schallenburger, Martin Neukirchen, Andrea Schmitz, Christian Schulz-Quach

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel SchlieperInterdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, DE.
Christiane AltreutherInterdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, DE.
Manuela SchallenburgerInterdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, DE.
Martin NeukirchenInterdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, DE.
Andrea SchmitzInterdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, DE.
Christian Schulz-QuachInterdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, DE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient is an instrument to deliver integrated care for patients in their last hours of life. Originally a paper-based system, this study investigates the feasibility of an electronic version.

methodsAn electronic Liverpool Care Pathway was implemented in a specialized palliative care unit of a German university hospital. Its use is exemplified by means of auditing and analysis of the proportion of recorded items.

resultsIn the years 2013 and 2014 the electronic Liverpool Care Pathway was used for the care of 159 patients. The uptake of the instrument was high (67%). Most items were recorded. Apart from a high usability, the fast data retrieval allows fast analysis for auditing and research. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: The electronic instrument is feasible in a computerized ward and has strong advantages for retrospective analysis.

trial registrationInternal Clinical Trial Register of the Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, No. 2015124683 (7 December 2015).

Indexed as

electronic medical recordhospitalintegrated careLiverpool Care Pathwaypalliative carepatient centred care

Identifiers

PMID28970746
PMCPMC5624064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.