Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28970733›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A consensus survey among Dutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons.

Stefanus J van Rooijen, Audrey Chm Jongen, Zhou-Qiao Wu, Jia-Fu Ji, Gerrit D Slooter, Rudi Mh Roumen, Nicole D Bouvy

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obesity and anastomotic leak rates in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Defining Anastomotic Leak and the Clinical Relevance of Leaks.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  15. The importance of rectal contrast in CT assessment to detect anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanus J van RooijenDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, 5500 MB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Audrey Chm JongenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Zhou-Qiao WuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Ward I of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Jia-Fu JiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Ward I of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Gerrit D SlooterDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, 5500 MB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Rudi Mh RoumenDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, 5500 MB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Nicole D BouvyDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Máxima Medisch Centrum · NLUniversity Medical Center · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the level of consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) among Dutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons.

methodsDutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons were asked to partake in an online questionnaire. Consensus in the online questionnaire was defined as > 80% agreement between respondents on various statements regarding a general definition of CAL, and regarding clinical and radiological diagnosis of the complication.

resultsFifty-nine Dutch and 202 Chinese dedicated colorectal surgeons participated in the online survey. Consensus was found on only one of the proposed elements of a general definition of CAL in both countries: 'extravasation of contrast medium after rectal enema on a CT scan'. Another two were found relevant according to Dutch surgeons: 'necrosis of the anastomosis found during reoperation', and 'a radiological collection treated with percutaneous drainage'. No consensus was found for all other proposed elements that may be included in a general definition.

conclusionThere is no universally accepted definition of CAL in the Netherlands and China. Diagnosis of CAL based on clinical manifestations remains a point of discussion in both countries. Dutch surgeons are more likely to report 'subclinical' leaks as CAL, which partly explains the higher reported Dutch CAL rates.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakChinaColonColorectal NeoplasmsContrast MediaHumansNetherlandsRadiographyRectumReoperationSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesContrast MediaColorectal anastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryComplicationDefinition

Identifiers

PMID28970733
PMCPMC5597509
OpenAlexW2754299089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.