Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28969642›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017

Knowledge mobilisation for policy development: implementing systems approaches through participatory dynamic simulation modelling.

Louise Freebairn, Lucie Rychetnik, Jo-An Atkinson, Paul Kelly, Geoff McDonnell, Nick Roberts, Christine Whittall, Sally Redman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Promoting sustained access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in Australia: a system-level implementation program.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cohort Profile Update: The 45 and Up Study.International journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Louise FreebairnACT Government, Health Directorate, GPO Box 825, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. louise.freebairn@act.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-870X
Lucie RychetnikThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, NSW, 1240, Sydney, Australia.
Jo-An AtkinsonThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, NSW, 1240, Sydney, Australia.
Paul KellyACT Government, Health Directorate, GPO Box 825, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Geoff McDonnellThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, NSW, 1240, Sydney, Australia.
Nick RobertsThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, NSW, 1240, Sydney, Australia.
Christine WhittallNSW Ministry of Health, LMB 961 North, Sydney, NSW, 2059, Australia.
Sally RedmanThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, NSW, 1240, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based decision-making is an important foundation for health policy and service planning decisions, yet there remain challenges in ensuring that the many forms of available evidence are considered when decisions are being made. Mobilising knowledge for policy and practice is an emergent process, and one that is highly relational, often messy and profoundly context dependent. Systems approaches, such as dynamic simulation modelling can be used to examine both complex health issues and the context in which they are embedded, and to develop decision support tools.

objectiveThis paper reports on the novel use of participatory simulation modelling as a knowledge mobilisation tool in Australian real-world policy settings. We describe how this approach combined systems science methodology and some of the core elements of knowledge mobilisation best practice. We describe the strategies adopted in three case studies to address both technical and socio-political issues, and compile the experiential lessons derived. Finally, we consider the implications of these knowledge mobilisation case studies and provide evidence for the feasibility of this approach in policy development settings.

conclusionParticipatory dynamic simulation modelling builds on contemporary knowledge mobilisation approaches for health stakeholders to collaborate and explore policy and health service scenarios for priority public health topics. The participatory methods place the decision-maker at the centre of the process and embed deliberative methods and co-production of knowledge. The simulation models function as health policy and programme dynamic decision support tools that integrate diverse forms of evidence, including research evidence, expert knowledge and localised contextual information. Further research is underway to determine the impact of these methods on health service decision-making.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHealth PolicyModels, TheoreticalPolicy MakingAustraliaCooperative BehaviorDecision MakingHumansPublic HealthAlcoholChildhood obesityDecision supportDiabetes in pregnancyKnowledge mobilisationParticipatory dynamic simulation modelling

Identifiers

PMID28969642
PMCPMC5629638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.