Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28969605›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

MetaComp: comprehensive analysis software for comparative meta-omics including comparative metagenomics.

Peng Zhai, Longshu Yang, Xiao Guo, Zhe Wang, Jiangtao Guo, Xiaoqi Wang, Huaiqiu Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng ZhaiState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Longshu YangState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xiao GuoCenter for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Zhe WangState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jiangtao GuoState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xiaoqi WangState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Huaiqiu ZhuState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. hqzhu@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the past decade, the development of high throughput nucleic sequencing and mass spectrometry analysis techniques have enabled the characterization of microbial communities through metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics and metabolomics data. To reveal the diversity of microbial communities and interactions between living conditions and microbes, it is necessary to introduce comparative analysis based upon integration of all four types of data mentioned above. Comparative meta-omics, especially comparative metageomics, has been established as a routine process to highlight the significant differences in taxon composition and functional gene abundance among microbiota samples. Meanwhile, biologists are increasingly concerning about the correlations between meta-omics features and environmental factors, which may further decipher the adaptation strategy of a microbial community.

resultsWe developed a graphical comprehensive analysis software named MetaComp comprising a series of statistical analysis approaches with visualized results for metagenomics and other meta-omics data comparison. This software is capable to read files generated by a variety of upstream programs. After data loading, analyses such as multivariate statistics, hypothesis testing of two-sample, multi-sample as well as two-group sample and a novel function-regression analysis of environmental factors are offered. Here, regression analysis regards meta-omic features as independent variable and environmental factors as dependent variables. Moreover, MetaComp is capable to automatically choose an appropriate two-group sample test based upon the traits of input abundance profiles. We further evaluate the performance of its choice, and exhibit applications for metagenomics, metaproteomics and metabolomics samples.

conclusionMetaComp, an integrative software capable for applying to all meta-omics data, originally distills the influence of living environment on microbial community by regression analysis. Moreover, since the automatically chosen two-group sample test is verified to be outperformed, MetaComp is friendly to users without adequate statistical training. These improvements are aiming to overcome the new challenges under big data era for all meta-omics data. MetaComp is available at: http://cqb.pku.edu.cn/ZhuLab/MetaComp/ and https://github.com/pzhaipku/MetaComp/ .

Indexed as

SoftwareData Interpretation, StatisticalGene Expression ProfilingGenes, MicrobialHumansMetabolomicsMetagenomicsMicrobiotaProteomicsComparative metagenomicsComparative meta-omicsGraphical user interfaceStatistical analysisVisualization

Identifiers

PMID28969605
PMCPMC5625784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.