ArticleMolecular pain
Affection of Comt1 genetype on anxiety and nociceptive sensitivity: an Ego-network analysis approach.
Article in Molecular pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenylyl cyclase 2 expression and function in neurological diseases.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to predict key genes and their relationships for anxiety and nociceptive sensitivity related to Comt1 genetype. Methods: : The raw data of E-GEOD-20160 related to anxiety and nociceptive sensitivity were obtained. Pearson correlation coefficient of interaction in protein–protein interaction was calculated. Topological analysis was processed for protein– protein interaction network, and genes in this network were ranked based on their degrees. Ego genes were identified, and models were searched and refined. A total of 1000 randomized tests were processed for ego networks. The classification accuracy of each ego network was obtained in this process. Results: The interactions with genes in gene expression profiles were extracted, and protein–protein interaction was constructed. The protein–protein interaction included 4639 genes and 43,837 relationships. Differential co-expression network was constructed, and 74 ego genes were obtained. Thereinto, top five ego genes were ADCY2, GRM8, S1PR3, ADCY6, and ANXA1. After module searching and refinement, a total of 11 candidate modules were obtained, including module 14, module 51, and module 9. In addition, these 11 modules were confirmed to be with significance. Module 14 contained 10 genes, such as HRH3, DRD2, and CXCR3. Similarly, module 51 included six genes, such as HELZ2, NCOA3, and MED30. Conclusions: Ego network analysis was a useful and comprehensive method for biomarkers screening. Several modules such as module 3 and module 36 were important subnetworks. Potential genes in these modules including ADCYs, GNAI1, DRD2, PNOC, CCR2, DRD2, and LPAR1 might be important genes in the research of anxiety and nociceptive sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.