Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28969366›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2017

Systems biology of personalized nutrition.

Ben van Ommen, Tim van den Broek, Iris de Hoogh, Marjan van Erk, Eugene van Someren, Tanja Rouhani-Rankouhi, Joshua C Anthony, Koen Hogenelst, Wilrike Pasman, André Boorsma and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Design Issues in Personalized Nutrition Advice Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ben van OmmenTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Tim van den BroekTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Iris de HooghTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Marjan van ErkTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Eugene van SomerenTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Tanja Rouhani-RankouhiTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Joshua C AnthonyHabit LLC, Oakland, California, USA.
Koen HogenelstTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Wilrike PasmanTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
André BoorsmaTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.
Suzan WopereisTNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Zeist, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized nutrition is fast becoming a reality due to a number of technological, scientific, and societal developments that complement and extend current public health nutrition recommendations. Personalized nutrition tailors dietary recommendations to specific biological requirements on the basis of a person's health status and goals. The biology underpinning these recommendations is complex, and thus any recommendations must account for multiple biological processes and subprocesses occurring in various tissues and must be formed with an appreciation for how these processes interact with dietary nutrients and environmental factors. Therefore, a systems biology-based approach that considers the most relevant interacting biological mechanisms is necessary to formulate the best recommendations to help people meet their wellness goals. Here, the concept of "systems flexibility" is introduced to personalized nutrition biology. Systems flexibility allows the real-time evaluation of metabolism and other processes that maintain homeostasis following an environmental challenge, thereby enabling the formulation of personalized recommendations. Examples in the area of macro- and micronutrients are reviewed. Genetic variations and performance goals are integrated into this systems approach to provide a strategy for a balanced evaluation and an introduction to personalized nutrition. Finally, modeling approaches that combine personalized diagnosis and nutritional intervention into practice are reviewed.

Indexed as

Nutritional RequirementsPrecision MedicineDietEnvironmentGenetic VariationHumansNutrigenomicsNutrition TherapySystems Biologyflexibilitynutrigeneticsnutrigenomicspersonalized nutritionsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID28969366
PMCPMC5914356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.