ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017
Prevalence of Specific
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- CagA toxin and risk of Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric phenotype: A meta-analysis of observational studies.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- The high sensitivity and specificity of rapid urease test in diagnosis ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Helicobacter pylori virulence dupA gene: risk factor or protective factor?Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicogenetic Impacts of Omeprazole: Genomic Instability and Cancer.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVirulent markers of
aimTo detect the prevalence of the MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was conducted at Department of Microbiology of Shree P.M. Patel College of Paramedical Sciences, Anand, Gujarat, India. Seventy one antral biopsies of symptomatic patients referred for endoscopy from October 2012 to September 2013 were subjected to Multiplex PCR. DNA isolation from 71 biopsy samples was done by using "QIAamp DNA mini kit" from QIAGEN (GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Data was analysed using Chi square (χ
resultsOut of the 71 biopsies screened, 22(31%) samples were positive for
conclusionThe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.