Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28968990›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Prediction of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria after radical resection.

Jiliang Feng, Junmei Chen, Ruidong Zhu, Lu Yu, Yan Zhang, Dezhao Feng, Heli Kong, Chenzhao Song, Hui Xia, Jushan Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Correlation between the expression profile of cytokeratin 19/glypican 3 and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional therapy].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiliang Feng *Clinical-Pathology Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Junmei Chen *Medical Laboratory Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ruidong ZhuSurgical Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lu YuClinical-Pathology Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhangClinical-Pathology Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dezhao FengCollege of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Heli KongClinical-Pathology Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chenzhao SongClinical-Pathology Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hui XiaSurgical Center, The 304th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Jushan WuSurgical Center, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dawei ZhaoMedical Imaging Department, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 50% hepatocellular carcinoma patients meeting the Milan criteria utilized to develop an improved prognostic model for predicting the recurrence in these patients. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, cytokeratin-19 and glypican-3 expression patterns, tumor number and histological grading from eight putative prognostic factors comprised the risk factor scoring model to predict the tumor recurrence. In the training cohort, the area under roc curve (AUC) value of the model was 0.715 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.645-0.786, P<0.001], which was the highest among all the parameters. The performance of the model was assessed using an independent validation cohort, wherein the AUC value was 0.760 (95% CI=0.647-0.874, P<0.001), which was higher than the other factors. The results indicated that model had high performance with adequate discrimination ability. Moreover, it significantly improved the predictive capacity for the recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria after radical resection.

Indexed as

cytokeratin 19glypican 3hepatocellular carcinomaMilan criteriaradical resection

Identifiers

PMID28968990
PMCPMC5609922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.