Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28968859›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2019

Visualizing and comparing circular genomes using the CGView family of tools.

Paul Stothard, Jason R Grant, Gary Van Domselaar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Genomic and Functional Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul Stothard
Jason R Grant
Gary Van Domselaar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphical genome maps are widely used to assess genome features and sequence characteristics. The CGView (Circular Genome Viewer) software family is a popular collection of tools for generating genome maps for bacteria, organelles and viruses. In this review, we describe the capabilities of the original CGView program along with those of subsequent companion applications, including the CGView Server and the CGView Comparison Tool. We also discuss GView, a graphical user interface-enabled rewrite of CGView, and the GView Server, which offers several integrated analyses for identifying shared or unique genome regions relative to a collection of comparison genomes. We conclude with some remarks about our current development efforts related to CGView aimed at adding new functionality while increasing ease of use.

Indexed as

SoftwareChromosome MappingComputational BiologyComputer GraphicsDNA, CircularEscherichia coli O157Genome, BacterialGenome, ViralGenomicsListeria monocytogenesUser-Computer InterfaceDNA, Circularbacteriagenome analysisgenome visualizationorganelles

Identifiers

PMID28968859
PMCPMC6781573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.