ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Gearing up to handle the mosaic nature of life in the quest for orthologs.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructing Evolutionary Histories with Hierarchical Orthologous Groups.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- Quest for Orthologs in the era of Data Deluge and AI: Challenges and Innovations in Orthology Prediction and Data Integration.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- The interkingdom horizontal gene transfer in 44 early diverging fungi boosted their metabolic, adaptive, and immune capabilities.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Real or fake? Measuring the impact of protein annotation errors on estimates of domain gain and loss events.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Frequent lineage-specific substitution rate changes support an episodic model for protein evolution.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Ten Years of Collaborative Progress in the Quest for Orthologs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Benchmarking orthology methods using phylogenetic patterns defined at the base of Eukaryotes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Benchmarking Orthogroup Inference Accuracy: Revisiting Orthobench.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Progress in quickly finding orthologs as reciprocal best hits: comparing blast, last, diamond and MMseqs2.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- A New Analysis of Archaea-Bacteria Domain Separation: Variable Phylogenetic Distance and the Tempo of Early Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- The Quest for Orthologs benchmark service and consensus calls in 2020.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Advances and Applications in the Quest for Orthologs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Measuring the impact of gene prediction on gene loss estimates in Eukaryotes by quantifying falsely inferred absences.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- OMA standalone: orthology inference among public and custom genomes and transcriptomes.Genome research · 2019Article
- OrthoInspector 3.0: open portal for comparative genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Enabling semantic queries across federated bioinformatics databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Expanding the Orthologous Matrix (OMA) programmatic interfaces: REST API and theF1000Research · 2019Article
- The OMA orthology database in 2018: retrieving evolutionary relationships among all domains of life through richer web and programmatic interfaces.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Quest for Orthologs (QfO) is an open collaboration framework for experts in comparative phylogenomics and related research areas who have an interest in highly accurate orthology predictions and their applications. We here report highlights and discussion points from the QfO meeting 2015 held in Barcelona. Achievements in recent years have established a basis to support developments for improved orthology prediction and to explore new approaches. Central to the QfO effort is proper benchmarking of methods and services, as well as design of standardized datasets and standardized formats to allow sharing and comparison of results. Simultaneously, analysis pipelines have been improved, evaluated and adapted to handle large datasets. All this would not have occurred without the long-term collaboration of Consortium members. Meeting regularly to review and coordinate complementary activities from a broad spectrum of innovative researchers clearly benefits the community. Highlights of the meeting include addressing sources of and legitimacy of disagreements between orthology calls, the context dependency of orthology definitions, special challenges encountered when analyzing very anciently rooted orthologies, orthology in the light of whole-genome duplications, and the concept of orthologous versus paralogous relationships at different levels, including domain-level orthology. Furthermore, particular needs for different applications (e.g. plant genomics, ancient gene families and others) and the infrastructure for making orthology inferences available (e.g. interfaces with model organism databases) were discussed, with several ongoing efforts that are expected to be reported on during the upcoming 2017 QfO meeting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.