ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2019
Federation in genomics pipelines: techniques and challenges.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A blockchain-based framework to support pharmacogenetic data sharing.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Pooled it
- Environmentally responsible human genomic data governance: points for consideration.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Environmental considerations in human genomic data governance: overcoming normative challenges.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Data access arrangements in genomic research consortia.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- Federated Analysis for Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing: A Technical and Legal Primer.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023Review
- A roadmap to advance exposomics through federation of data.Exposome · 2023Article
- Democratizing clinical-genomic data: How federated platforms can promote benefits sharing in genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Sustainable biobanks: a case study for a green global bioethics.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2022Article
- A Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Architecture to Support Clinical Genomic Data Sharing (ConsentChain): Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Deciphering the Omics of Plant-Microbe Interaction: Perspectives and New Insights.Current genomics · 2020Review
- Scalable Genome Assembly through Parallel de Bruijn Graph Construction for Multiple k-mers.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A Distributed Classifier for MicroRNA Target Prediction with Validation Through TCGA Expression Data.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federation is a popular concept in building distributed cyberinfrastructures, whereby computational resources are provided by multiple organizations through a unified portal, decreasing the complexity of moving data back and forth among multiple organizations. Federation has been used in bioinformatics only to a limited extent, namely, federation of datastores, e.g. SBGrid Consortium for structural biology and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) for functional genomics. Here, we posit that it is important to federate both computational resources (CPU, GPU, FPGA, etc.) and datastores to support popular bioinformatics portals, with fast-increasing data volumes and increasing processing requirements. A prime example, and one that we discuss here, is in genomics and metagenomics. It is critical that the processing of the data be done without having to transport the data across large network distances. We exemplify our design and development through our experience with metagenomics-RAST (MG-RAST), the most popular metagenomics analysis pipeline. Currently, it is hosted completely at Argonne National Laboratory. However, through a recently started collaborative National Institutes of Health project, we are taking steps toward federating this infrastructure. Being a widely used resource, we have to move toward federation without disrupting 50 K annual users. In this article, we describe the computational tools that will be useful for federating a bioinformatics infrastructure and the open research challenges that we see in federating such infrastructures. It is hoped that our manuscript can serve to spur greater federation of bioinformatics infrastructures by showing the steps involved, and thus, allow them to scale to support larger user bases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.