ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
SNPDelScore: combining multiple methods to score deleterious effects of noncoding mutations in the human genome.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- ChromDL: a next-generation regulatory DNA classifier.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- ChromDL: A Next-Generation Regulatory DNA Classifier.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Substrate recognition and cryo-EM structure of the ribosome-bound TAC toxin of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Prediction of disease-associated nsSNPs by integrating multi-scale ResNet models with deep feature fusion.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Admixture Mapping of Sepsis in European Individuals With African Ancestries.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Targeted analysis of genomic regions enriched in African ancestry reveals novel classical HLA alleles associated with asthma in Southwestern Europeans.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- WEVar: a novel statistical learning framework for predicting noncoding regulatory variants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Functional interpretation of genetic variants using deep learning predicts impact on chromatin accessibility and histone modification.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- De novo pattern discovery enables robust assessment of functional consequences of non-coding variants.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
summaryAddressing deleterious effects of noncoding mutations is an essential step towards the identification of disease-causal mutations of gene regulatory elements. Several methods for quantifying the deleteriousness of noncoding mutations using artificial intelligence, deep learning and other approaches have been recently proposed. Although the majority of the proposed methods have demonstrated excellent accuracy on different test sets, there is rarely a consensus. In addition, advanced statistical and artificial learning approaches used by these methods make it difficult porting these methods outside of the labs that have developed them. To address these challenges and to transform the methodological advances in predicting deleterious noncoding mutations into a practical resource available for the broader functional genomics and population genetics communities, we developed SNPDelScore, which uses a panel of proposed methods for quantifying deleterious effects of noncoding mutations to precompute and compare the deleteriousness scores of all common SNPs in the human genome in 44 cell lines. The panel of deleteriousness scores of a SNP computed using different methods is supplemented by functional information from the GWAS Catalog, libraries of transcription factor-binding sites, and genic characteristics of mutations. SNPDelScore comes with a genome browser capable of displaying and comparing large sets of SNPs in a genomic locus and rapidly identifying consensus SNPs with the highest deleteriousness scores making those prime candidates for phenotype-causal polymorphisms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/snpdelscore/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.