ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2019
Integrating regulatory features data for prediction of functional disease-associated SNPs.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of the most deleterious non-synonymous SNPs in the human IL1B gene: evidence from bioinformatics analyses.BMC genomic data · 2024Article
- Metabolic and Genetic Markers Improve Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Nested Case-Control Study in Chinese.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Article
- Enhancer-Gene Interaction Analyses Identified the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as a Susceptibility Gene for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2021Article
- Use of Machine Learning Approaches in Clinical Epidemiological Research of Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2020Review
- Multiomics dissection of molecular regulatory mechanisms underlying autoimmune-associated noncoding SNPs.JCI insight · 2020Article
- Addressing the Missing Heritability Problem With the Help of Regulatory Features.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are an effective strategy to identify susceptibility loci for human complex diseases. However, missing heritability is still a big problem. Most GWASs single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are located in noncoding regions, which has been considered to be the unexplored territory of the genome. Recently, data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) and Roadmap Epigenomics projects have shown that many GWASs SNPs in the noncoding regions fall within regulatory elements. In this study, we developed a pipeline named functional disease-associated SNPs prediction (FDSP), to identify novel susceptibility loci for complex diseases based on the interpretation of the functional features for known disease-associated variants with machine learning. We applied our pipeline to predict novel susceptibility SNPs for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension. The predicted SNPs could explain heritability beyond that explained by GWAS-associated SNPs. Functional annotation by expression quantitative trait loci analyses showed that the target genes of the predicted SNPs were significantly enriched in T2D or hypertension-related pathways in multiple tissues. Our results suggest that combining GWASs and regulatory features data could identify additional functional susceptibility SNPs for complex diseases. We hope FDSP could help to identify novel susceptibility loci for complex diseases and solve the missing heritability problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.