Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28968638›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

tmVar 2.0: integrating genomic variant information from literature with dbSNP and ClinVar for precision medicine.

Chih-Hsuan Wei, Lon Phan, Juliana Feltz, Rama Maiti, Tim Hefferon, Zhiyong Lu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. OncoCTMiner: streamlining precision oncology trial matching via molecular profile analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Alzheimer's Disease Eligibility Criteria.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing the use of supplementary materials to improve genomic variant discovery.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. RegEl corpus: identifying DNA regulatory elements in the scientific literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chih-Hsuan WeiNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Lon PhanNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Juliana FeltzNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Rama MaitiNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Tim HefferonNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
National Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Despite significant efforts in expert curation, clinical relevance about most of the 154 million dbSNP reference variants (RS) remains unknown. However, a wealth of knowledge about the variant biological function/disease impact is buried in unstructured literature data. Previous studies have attempted to harvest and unlock such information with text-mining techniques but are of limited use because their mutation extraction results are not standardized or integrated with curated data. Results: We propose an automatic method to extract and normalize variant mentions to unique identifiers (dbSNP RSIDs). Our method, in benchmarking results, demonstrates a high F-measure of ∼90% and compared favorably to the state of the art. Next, we applied our approach to the entire PubMed and validated the results by verifying that each extracted variant-gene pair matched the dbSNP annotation based on mapped genomic position, and by analyzing variants curated in ClinVar. We then determined which text-mined variants and genes constituted novel discoveries. Our analysis reveals 41 889 RS numbers (associated with 9151 genes) not found in ClinVar. Moreover, we obtained a rich set worth further review: 12 462 rare variants (MAF ≤ 0.01) in 3849 genes which are presumed to be deleterious and not frequently found in the general population. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study to analyze and integrate text-mined variant data with curated knowledge in existing databases. Our results suggest that databases can be significantly enriched by text mining and that the combined information can greatly assist human efforts in evaluating/prioritizing variants in genomic research. Availability and implementation: The tmVar 2.0 source code and corpus are freely available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/bionlp/Tools/tmvar/. Contact: zhiyong.lu@nih.gov.

Indexed as

MutationPolymorphism, GeneticSoftwareDatabases, FactualData CurationData MiningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansPhenotypePrecision MedicinePublicationsPubMed

Identifiers

PMID28968638
PMCPMC5860583
OpenAlexW2752636837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.