ArticlePloS one2017
MicroRNA-16 feedback loop with p53 and Wip1 can regulate cell fate determination between apoptosis and senescence in DNA damage response.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR‑16‑5p Protects RGCs Against Retinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Modulating Astrocyte-Mediated Neuroinflammation Through the Wip1/NF-κB Signaling Axis.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Canalization as a stabilizing principle of gene regulatory networks: a discrete dynamical systems perspective.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Article
- miR-16-5p enhances sensitivity to RG7388 through targetingCancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023Article
- microRNA-Mediated Encoding and Decoding of Time-Dependent Signals in Tumorigenesis.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- MicroRNAs in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: The DNA damage response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- UV-type specific alteration of miRNA expression and its association with tumor progression and metastasis in SCC cell lines.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Dynamical gene regulatory networks are tuned by transcriptional autoregulation with microRNA feedback.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- TP53/miR-34a-associated signaling targetsAging · 2020Article
- Coordination of miR-192 and miR-22 in p53-Mediated Cell Fate Decision.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- microRNA-16-5p enhances radiosensitivity through modulating Cyclin D1/E1-pRb-E2F1 pathway in prostate cancer cells.Journal of cellular physiology · 2019Article
- DNA Damage-Response Pathway Heterogeneity of Human Lung Cancer A549 and H1299 Cells Determines Sensitivity to 8-Chloro-Adenosine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Loss of miR-16 contributes to tumor progression by activation of tousled-like kinase 1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell fate regulation is an open problem whose comprehension impacts several areas of the biosciences. DNA damage induces cell cycle checkpoints that activate the p53 pathway to regulate cell fate mechanisms such as apoptosis or senescence. Experiments with different cell types show that the p53 pathway regulates cell fate through a switch behavior in its dynamics. For low DNA damage the pathway presents an oscillatory pattern associated with intense DNA damage repair while for high damage there are no oscillations and either p53 concentration increases inducing apoptosis or the cell enters a senescence state. Apoptosis and senescence phenotypes seem to have compensatory functions in tissues and the microRNA 16-1 (miR-16) is involved in the regulation of the fate between both phenotypes in cancer cells. To investigate the regulation of cell fate we developed a logical model of the G1/S checkpoint in DNA damage response that takes into account different levels of damage and contemplates the influence of miR-16 through its positive feedback loop formed with p53 and Wip1. The model reproduces the observed cellular phenotypes in experiments: oscillatory (for low DNA damage) regulated by negative feedback loops involving mainly p53 and Mdm2 and apoptotic or senescent (for high DNA damage) regulated by the positive p53/Wip1/miR-16 feedback loop. We find good agreement between the level of DNA damage and the probability of the phenotype produced according to experiments. We also find that this positive feedback makes senescent and apoptotic phenotypes to be determined stochastically (bistable), however controlling the expression level of miR-16 allows the control of fate determination as observed experimentally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.