ArticlePloS one2017
Gene expression analysis of primordial shoot explants collected from mature white spruce (Picea glauca) trees that differ in their responsiveness to somatic embryogenesis induction.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Proteomic and Metabolomic Analyses Provide Insights Into Acquisition of Embryogenic Ability inFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Internal and External Regulatory Elements Controlling Somatic Embryogenesis in Catharanthus: A Model Medicinal Plant.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genes, proteins and other networks regulating somatic embryogenesis in plants.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2020Review
- Cytological, Biochemical and Molecular Events of the Embryogenic State in Douglas-fir (Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration From Primordial Shoot Explants ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Molecular Dissection of the Regenerative Capacity of Forest Tree Species: Special Focus on Conifers.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within a plantation of clonal somatic embryo-derived white spruce trees that belonged to four genotypes, one genotype (G6) has consistently responded for the last 16 years, to the induction of somatic embryogenesis within primordial shoot explants. Analysis of fourteen individuals within this genotype subsequently revealed a group of clonal trees that were nonresponsive. This in turn provided a unique opportunity to conduct differential gene expression analysis in the absence of genotype-specific factors. Absolute qPCR was first used to expand the analysis of several genes previously identified via microarray analysis to be differentially expressed during SE induction, along with the inclusion of two nonresponsive genotypes. While this demonstrated a high level of repeatability within, and between, responsive and nonresponsive genotypes, it did not support our previous contention that an adaptive stress response plays a role in SE induction responsiveness, at least with respect to the candidate genes we analyzed. RNAseq analysis was then used to compare responsive and nonresponsive G6 primordial shoots during the somatic embryogenesis induction treatment. Although not analyzed in this study, this included samples of callus and embryonal masses previously generated from G6 explants. In addition to revealing a large number of differentially expressed genes, de novo assembly of unmapped reads was used to generate over 25,000 contigs that potentially represent previously unidentified transcripts. This included a MADS-domain gene that was found to be the most highly differentially expressed gene within responsive shoot explants during the first seven days of the induction treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.