Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28968240›Full record

ArticleJournal of Huntington's disease2017

Families Affected by Huntington's Disease Report Difficulties in Communication, Emotional Involvement, and Problem Solving.

Celine M H Jona, Izelle Labuschagne, Emily-Clare Mercieca, Fiona Fisher, Cathy Gluyas, Julie C Stout, Sophie C Andrews

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Huntington's disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Celine M H JonaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, VIC, Australia.
Izelle LabuschagneSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, VIC, Australia.
Emily-Clare MerciecaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, VIC, Australia.
Fiona FisherCalvary Health Care Bethlehem, Caulfield, VIC, Australia.
Cathy GluyasCalvary Health Care Bethlehem, Caulfield, VIC, Australia.
Julie C StoutSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, VIC, Australia.
Sophie C AndrewsSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, VIC, Australia.
Monash University · AUCalvary Health Care Bethlehem · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily functioning in Huntington's disease (HD) is known from previous studies to be adversely affected. However, which aspects of family functioning are disrupted is unknown, limiting the empirical basis around which to create supportive interventions.

objectiveThe aim of the current study was to assess family functioning in HD families.

methodsWe assessed family functioning in 61 participants (38 HD gene-expanded participants and 23 family members) using the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD; Epstein, Baldwin and Bishop, 1983), which provides scores for seven domains of functioning: Problem Solving; Communication; Affective Involvement; Affective Responsiveness; Behavior Control; Roles; and General Family Functioning.

resultsThe most commonly reported disrupted domain for HD participants was Affective Involvement, which was reported by 39.5% of HD participants, followed closely by General Family Functioning (36.8%). For family members, the most commonly reported dysfunctional domains were Affective Involvement and Communication (both 52.2%). Furthermore, symptomatic HD participants reported more disruption to Problem Solving than pre-symptomatic HD participants. In terms of agreement between pre-symptomatic and symptomatic HD participants and their family members, all domains showed moderate to very good agreement. However, on average, family members rated Communication as more disrupted than their HD affected family member.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need to target areas of emotional engagement, communication skills and problem solving in family interventions in HD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChi-Square DistributionCognition DisordersCommunication DisordersFamilyFemaleHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedMood DisordersProblem SolvingSurveys and QuestionnairesAffective involvementcommunicationfamilyfamily functioningHuntington’s diseaseproblem solving

Identifiers

PMID28968240
PMCPMC5682576
OpenAlexW2759461224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.