Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28967698›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2018

Right ventricular involvement and the extent of left ventricular enhancement with magnetic resonance predict adverse outcome in pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Jan-Peter Smedema, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Joris Ector, Hein Heidbuchel, Gillian Ainslie, Harry J G M Crijns

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. FDG-PET in possible cardiac sarcoidosis: Right ventricular uptake and high total cardiac metabolic activity predict cardiovascular events.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis in 2020.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Current cardiology reports · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan-Peter SmedemaDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robert-Jan van GeunsDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joris EctorDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Hein HeidbuchelVirga Jesse Hospital, University of Hasselt Heart Centre, Hasselt, Belgium.
Gillian AinslieRespiratory Clinic, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLGroote Schuur Hospital · ZAJessa Hospital · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCardiac involvement is the main determinant of poor outcomes in sarcoidosis. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and left ventricular (LV) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have been reported to be predictive of adverse outcome in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. The aim of our study was to determine whether delayed RV LGE with cardiovascular magnetic resonance would be predictive of adverse events in addition to LV LGE during the long-term follow-up of pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. METHODS AND

resultsEighty-four consecutive biopsy-proven pulmonary sarcoidosis patients were followed for a median of 56 months [38-74] after baseline delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. The composite primary endpoint consisted of admission for congestive heart failure, sustained ventricular tachycardia, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, pacemaker implantation for high degree atrio-ventricular block, or cardiac death. The composite secondary endpoint included all-cause mortality in addition to the primary endpoint. RV and LV LGE were demonstrated in respectively 12 and 27 patients. Five of 10 events included in the primary endpoint occurred in the group with RV LGE. RV LGE, LV, or biventricular LGE yielded Cox hazard ratios of 8.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.90-23.81], 9.22 (95% CI 1.96-43.45), and 12.09 (95% CI 3.43-42.68) for the composite primary endpoint. In a multivariate model, the predictive value of biventricular LGE for the composite primary and secondary endpoints was strongest. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves were most significant for RV LGE and biventricular LGE (log rank with P < 0.001).

conclusionsBiventricular LGE at presentation is the strongest, independent predictor of adverse outcome during long-term follow-up. Asymptomatic myocardial scar <8% of LV mass carried a favourable long-term outcome.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentCardiomyopathiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart VentriclesHumansIncidenceMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumNetherlandsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSarcoidosis, PulmonaryVentricular Dysfunction, RightCardiovascular magnetic resonanceLate gadolinium enhancementRight ventricleRisk stratificationSarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID28967698
PMCPMC5793959
OpenAlexW2789631442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.