Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28967042›Full record

SynthesisTropical animal health and production2018

A systematic review of leptospirosis on wild animals in Latin America.

Anahi S Vieira, Priscila S Pinto, Walter Lilenbaum

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical animal health and production, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Detection of zoonotic pathogens in invasive black rats (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Host-Driven Genetic Diversity ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  9. A first insight into the occurrence ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Leptospira borgptersenii and Leptospira interrogans identified in wild mammals in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  13. Detection of Antibodies for PathogenicAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. High Exposure to Livestock Pathogens in Southern Pudu (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Genotyping ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anahi S VieiraLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Biomedical Institute, Fluminense Federal University, 101 Prof. Hernani Mello Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Priscila S PintoLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Biomedical Institute, Fluminense Federal University, 101 Prof. Hernani Mello Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Walter LilenbaumLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Biomedical Institute, Fluminense Federal University, 101 Prof. Hernani Mello Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. wlilenbauw@id.uff.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-8728
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a bacterial systemic infection which affects domestic animals and wildlife, as well as humans. Many wild animals act as reservoirs of leptospires. Nevertheless, the real role of wildlife animals as source of infection to livestock and humans, as well as the most important reservoirs and leptospiral strains remains unclear. This systematic review assesses the available data about wildlife and their biomes in Latin America, concerning to leptospiral infection. In addition, we discuss the development of the research on leptospirosis in wildlife in this region. After the application of exclusion criteria, 79 papers were analyzed, comprising 186 species, 122 genus, 53 families, and 19 orders from four classes. Mammals were the most studied class, followed by Amphibian, Reptile, and Aves. The Icterohaemorrhagiae serogroup was predominant in most biomes and many orders. A small number of antigens detected the majority of seroreactive animals of each class, and a smaller panel may be used at microscopic agglutination test. Further studies must always consider edaphoclimatic conditions besides only host class or species, in order to obtain a broader understanding of the wild epidemiological cycle of leptospirosis in the region. In conclusion, direct and indirect evidences demonstrate that leptospirosis is largely widespread among wildlife in all biomes of Latin America. Moreover, more research on the role of wildlife on the epidemiology of leptospirosis and its impact on livestock and public health are required, particularly focusing on direct detection of the agent.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildEcosystemHumansLatin AmericaLeptospiraLeptospirosisLivestockMammalsReptilesSerogroupHostsLeptospiraReservoirTropicalWildlife

Identifiers

PMID28967042
OpenAlexW2760607849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.