Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28966831›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2017

A Design Study Investigating Augmented Reality and Photograph Annotation in a Digitalized Grossing Workstation.

Joyce A Chow, Martin E Törnros, Marie Waltersson, Helen Richard, Madeleine Kusoffsky, Claes F Lundström, Arianit Kurti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joyce A ChowRISE Interactive Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.
Martin E TörnrosInteraktiva Rum Sverige, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marie WalterssonCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Helen RichardDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Madeleine KusoffskyRISE Interactive Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.
Claes F LundströmCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Arianit KurtiRISE Interactive Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextWithin digital pathology, digitalization of the grossing procedure has been relatively underexplored in comparison to digitalization of pathology slides.

aimsOur investigation focuses on the interaction design of an augmented reality gross pathology workstation and refining the interface so that information and visualizations are easily recorded and displayed in a thoughtful view. SETTINGS AND

designThe work in this project occurred in two phases: the first phase focused on implementation of an augmented reality grossing workstation prototype while the second phase focused on the implementation of an incremental prototype in parallel with a deeper design study. SUBJECTS AND

methodsOur research institute focused on an experimental and "designerly" approach to create a digital gross pathology prototype as opposed to focusing on developing a system for immediate clinical deployment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Evaluation has not been limited to user tests and interviews, but rather key insights were uncovered through design methods such as "

resultsWe developed an augmented reality enhanced digital grossing station prototype to assist pathology technicians in capturing data during examination. The prototype uses a magnetically tracked scalpel to annotate planned cuts and dimensions onto photographs taken of the work surface. This article focuses on the use of qualitative design methods to evaluate and refine the prototype. Our aims were to build on the strengths of the prototype's technology, improve the ergonomics of the digital/physical workstation by considering numerous alternative design directions, and to consider the effects of digitalization on personnel and the pathology diagnostics information flow from a wider perspective. A proposed interface design allows the pathology technician to place images in relation to its orientation, annotate directly on the image, and create linked information.

conclusionsThe augmented reality magnetically tracked scalpel reduces tool switching though limitations in today's augmented reality technology fall short of creating an ideal immersive workflow by requiring the use of a monitor. While this technology catches up, we recommend focusing efforts on enabling the easy creation of layered, complex reports, linking, and viewing information across systems. Reflecting upon our results, we argue for digitalization to focus not only on how to record increasing amounts of data but also how these data can be accessed in a more thoughtful way that draws upon the expertise and creativity of pathology professionals using the systems.

Indexed as

Augmented realitydesign methodsgross pathologyhuman–computer interactioninterface designvisualization

Identifiers

PMID28966831
PMCPMC5609362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.