ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical innovation2017
Comparing Adoption of Breakthrough and "Me-too" Drugs among Medicare Beneficiaries: A Case Study of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical innovation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Therapy: From Discovery to Type 2 Diabetes and Beyond.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Varenicline and Nicotine Replacement Use Associated With US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications.JAMA network open · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose"Me-too" drugs are new pharmaceuticals with the mechanism of action of an existing drug and are considered less innovative than breakthrough drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the adoption patterns of the breakthrough drug sitagliptin and the "me-too" drug saxagliptin differed; and to assess whether the patterns differed between Medicare stand-alone (PDP) and Medicare-Advantage Part D (MA-PD) plans.
methodsPharmacy claims from a 5% random sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries were used to identify all prescriptions filled for sitagliptin (breakthrough drug) and saxagliptin ("me-too" drug) between October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2011. The number of new sitagliptin and saxagliptin users by month and type of plan were plotted, and Bass diffusion models were constructed to estimate the rate of diffusion.
resultsSitagliptin had a longer adoption life than saxagliptin, and its adoption was quicker among MA-PD than PDP beneficiaries: it peaked at 51 and 66.7 months after its approval, respectively. However, the adoption of saxagliptin did not differ by type of plan: it peaked at 20.5 months in PDP and 22.9 months in MA-PD. At the end of our study, the market share of the innovative drug sitagliptin measured as the cumulative number of users since market entry was almost nine times higher than the "me-too" drug, saxagliptin.
conclusionsThe breakthrough drug sitagliptin had a much longer adoption life compared to the "me-too" drug saxagliptin, and the breakthrough drug sitagliptin was adopted quicker among managed care plans compared to PDP plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.