Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28966646›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2017

Zhi-Xin Yang, Jia-Hong Xie, Ding-Ding Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhi-Xin YangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3755-5977
Jia-Hong XieKey Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research and Development, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei Province, China.
Ding-Ding LiuSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei Province, China.
Chengde Medical University · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the DATA SOURCES: We retrieved relevant randomized controlled trials involving DATA SELECTION: We analyzed randomized and semi-randomized clinical controlled trials that compared OUTCOME MEASURES: The mortality rate, disability rate, activities of daily living (Barthel Index), and clinical efficacy were observed.

resultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The meta-analysis showed that between

conclusionThe

Indexed as

activities of daily livingacute ischemic strokeBarthel indexclinical efficacydisability ratemeta-analysismortalitynerve regenerationneural regenerationsystematic reviewXingnao Kaiqiao needling method

Identifiers

PMID28966646
PMCPMC5607826
OpenAlexW2747244774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.